Laserfiche WebLink
364 <br /> City Clerk - Account No. 420 (continued) <br /> It was requested that an addition to the "Program <br /> Mission statement relating to the Clerk' s office be <br /> written to reflect the considerable amount of time that •m <br /> office must devote to meeting requirements of the State <br /> with regard to statements of Council members and candi- <br /> dates concerning campaign expenses and disclosure of <br /> assets as well as to storing those documents. <br /> Account No. 420 was approved as submitted, with the re- <br /> quested addition to the Program Mission. <br /> City Treasurer - Account No. 421 (pp. 20-21) <br /> Discussion commenced concerning revenues derived from <br /> the business license tax and the equity of the method <br /> of determining the tax. <br /> MOTION: Councilman Norris moved that the business li- <br /> cense tax be researched by staff and information pro- <br /> vided to Council before adoption of the Budget regarding <br /> other alternatives that could be used in assessing the <br /> tax--for example, a tax on gross receipts. <br /> The motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> MOTION: Councilman Norris moved, seconded by Councilman <br /> Rhodes, that the subject of an admission tax be referred <br /> to staff for research and consideration and that a report <br /> be provided to Council before adoption of the budget. <br /> Lengthy discussion followed and Council and citizens <br /> commented concerning the possible risks involved in adding <br /> an admission tax to ticket costs; whether it would be <br /> possible to do adequate research in the period before <br /> budget adoption is scheduled ; the inconsistency among <br /> cities with regard to imposition of an admission tax; <br /> the fact that in many cases admission tax would be paid <br /> by transients and might cover some of the costs of their <br /> use of City services and facilities; the fact that busi- <br /> nesses which might be required to charge an admission <br /> tax are already taxed for a license and on the basis of <br /> property ownership and sales; the fact that such busi- <br /> nesses employ many citizens; whether or not an admission <br /> tax would be advisable at this time; and whether it might <br /> not be a better approach for all cities to pursue the <br /> matter of additional revenue sources through the League <br /> of California Cities rather than on a piecemeal, city by <br /> city, basis. <br /> The motion carried unanimously by roll call vote. <br /> Approval of Account No. 421 will be withheld pending Now <br /> receipt of the report from staff regarding an admission <br /> tax. book <br /> (Council recessed from 12 :22 to 2 :00 p.m. ) <br /> -6- <br /> Budget <br /> Study <br /> 5/10/75 <br />