Laserfiche WebLink
18 <br /> Capital Improvements Program - Streets <br /> Traffic Striping Machine <br /> Lou Byrne (see above) suggested that the subject <br /> machine could be rented to nearby cities such as <br /> Menlo Park and San Carlos to do their striping <br /> also, thereby reducing the costs to each of the <br /> cities. City Manager Fales advised that the City <br /> would be in agreement with such a proposal and has <br /> attempted to set up such a shared ownership program <br /> with regard to heavy trucks, cranes, fire equipment <br /> and other large expensive pieces of equipment, but <br /> has met with indifference by other cities in the <br /> County, although in other parts of the Bay Area <br /> such is the practice . He observed that even when <br /> there has been agreement with regard to such pro- <br /> grams as the alternate year Cordilleras creek <br /> cleaning program with San Carlos, Redwood City has <br /> encountered lack of cooperation and had to clean <br /> the creek every year or risk flooding and other <br /> problems . <br /> Capital Improvements Program - Sewerage System <br /> Joint Authority <br /> City Manager Fales replied to questions from Council <br /> concerning details regarding the City ' s participation <br /> in the Strategic Consolidated Sewerage Program, ob- <br /> serving <br /> that estimates cannot yet be accurate for <br /> the total City obligation for 1976-77. Mr. Fales <br /> commented on the need for 100% cash flow, since the <br /> federal government will reimburse the City for 87-% <br /> of the total cost, but the City must have the funds <br /> to make the payments first. <br /> City Manager Pales commented generally on the $244,000 <br /> in the Capital Outlay Fund which is unallocated and re- <br /> plied to questions with regard to the parking district. <br /> MOTION: Councilman Leipzig moved, seconded by Councilman <br /> Norris, to allocate $8,000 from the unallocated Capital <br /> Outlay Fund to be used to eliminate the parking meters <br /> in the Downtown Project, leaving a balance of $236 ,000. <br /> It was explained that $8,000 is the estimated annual <br /> revenue received from the meters which are considered <br /> undesirable in the new project and which have been re- <br /> moved and would have to be replaced, if the revenue <br /> derived from them is not provided. <br /> Mrs. Wymer (see above) inquired as to the money allocated <br /> to replace the presently removed parking meters . Mr. <br /> Pales explained that it is not required the meters be <br /> replaced as long as the revenue they provide is replaced <br /> or the parking district bonds are paid . He advised <br /> further that a project change order would accomplish <br /> the removal of the meters and the funds which it might <br /> have cost to replace them would remain in the project <br /> for use . <br /> -18- <br /> Budget <br /> Study <br /> 6/7/75 <br />