Laserfiche WebLink
I,23 <br /> In response to question, Assistant City Attorney Maloney <br /> advised that Council may overrule protests and determine <br /> whether or not it is in the best interest of the City to <br /> establish an underground district. Director of Public <br /> Works Pusich referred to a slide depicting the proposed <br /> underground district and advised that the American <br /> Legion hall is not in the proposed district, since the <br /> property does not receive utility service from El <br /> Camino Real. <br /> Albert Davies, 1101 El Camino Real, asked whether the <br /> district being proposed is an assessment district and <br /> whether utilities will be entirely underground. Mr. <br /> Davies was advised that the proposed district is not <br /> an assessment district, and the only cost to property <br /> owners will be for reconnection. <br /> Mrs. John Puppo, 3501 Eden Drive, Santa Clara, referred <br /> to her property as depicted on the slide projection of <br /> the proposed district, and asked how it would be affected. <br /> Mr. Pusich advised that her property will not be affected <br /> as it appears not to be in the proposed district. <br /> Frank Nash, Pacific Ready Mix, 25 Maple Street, referred <br /> to his property as depicted on the slide and asked <br /> whether, if utility service is available from the rear <br /> of his lot, he could change to that service rather than <br /> reconnect on El Camino Real. Staff advised that the de- <br /> cision belongs to PG&E, observed that there might be <br /> future benefits' to be derived from an El Camino Real <br /> connection, and recommended Mr. Nash pursue the matter <br /> with PG&E. <br /> Marie Summers, Chef ' s Enterprise, 1428 El Camino Real, <br /> inquired as to the anticipated disruption and its pos- <br /> sible effect on business. Mr. Summers made the same <br /> inquiry. Staff and Mr. Carrera advised that construc- <br /> tion will take place as quickly as possible resulting <br /> in disruption of about a week in each block and noted <br /> that the only problem will be the asphalt instead of <br /> concrete sidewalks during the project construction <br /> period. . <br /> MOTION : Councilman Williams moved, seconded by Council- <br /> man Leipzig, to close the public hearing. <br /> The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> The public hea"ring was closed at 8 :45 p.m. <br /> MOTION: Title having been read, Councilman Henderson <br /> introduced the following ordinance and moved, seconded <br /> by Councilman Barrett, its approval for first reading: <br /> ORDINANCE ESTABLISHING UNDERGROUND UTILITY DIS- <br /> TRICT IN PORTION OF CITY OF REDWOOD CITY; AND <br /> DESIGNATING SAID DISTRICT AS UNDERGROUND UTILITY <br /> DISTRICT NO. 73-1; DESCRIBING THE BOUNDARIES OF <br /> SAID DISTRICT; AND ESTABLISHING THE TIMES IN <br /> WHICH POLES AND OVERHEAD WIRES SHALL BE REMOVED <br /> AND UNDERGROUND SERVICE PROVIDED <br /> -4- <br /> Reg.Mtg. <br /> 8/25/75 <br />