Laserfiche WebLink
9 <br /> 2 <br /> mai <br /> 1. GEOGRAPHICAL JURISDICTION OF PORT (continued) <br /> M/S for the Port Commission: Keckley/Mauk that a joint committee of rod <br /> the City Council and the Port Commission and their staffs be <br /> established to bring back recommendations relating to regulation of <br /> land use in areas of potential conflict between the City and the <br /> Port. <br /> CLARIFICATION: Port Commissioner Keckley explained that it is his <br /> expectation that both the Port and the Council and their staffs would <br /> consider the matter separately and then conduct a joint meeting or <br /> meetings in order to make decisions. <br /> Carried by majority voice vote. <br /> M/S: for City Council: Stangel/Britschgi that a joint committee of <br /> the City Council and the Port Commission and their staffs be <br /> established to bring back recommendations relating to regulation of <br /> land use in areas of potential conflict between the City and the <br /> Port, noting Commissioner Keckley's clarification. <br /> Carried by majority voice vote, Mayor Biagi determining the vote to <br /> be four ayes and two noes. MINUTE ORDER NO. 81-107A <br /> 2. REVIEW OF WATERFRONT/PORT AREA PLANS <br /> President Dragan stated and Mayor Biagi concurred, that the matter of <br /> review of the waterfront and Port area plans would be discussed in <br /> connection with the jurisdiction assignment to the Joint Committee. <br /> MINUTE ORDER NO. 81-107B <br /> mei <br /> 3. SHARING OF PORT REVENUES <br /> Port Manager Di Pietro reviewed the Port Statement of Income and Expense arra <br /> for Fiscal Years 1975-76 through 1980-81, noting the decline in net <br /> income for 1980-81 following a rise in the previous years. Mr. Di Pietro <br /> reported a decline in some cargoes and the commitment of the Port to the <br /> 1979 revenue bonds. <br /> In response to questions, City/Port Attorney Schricker called attention <br /> to Section 48d. of the Charter which provides that the Board of Port <br /> Commissioners "may from time to time pay over to the General Funds of the <br /> city profits from the operation of the port and any surplus funds which <br /> in its judgment may not be needed for port purposes." <br /> Mr. Di Pietro reviewed the progress which has been made at the Port in <br /> the past eight years, the commitment to bond holders, the investment of <br /> the Port in sewage capacity for future development, the new water and <br /> sewer line and the earnings which have been invested in the Port plant. <br /> Mr. Di Pietro observed that capital improvements are necessary for which <br /> money has not yet been earned and noted that the cement business has not <br /> met the projections of the cement companies, and there has been a decline <br /> in petroleum product imports. He said that there is a need to expand <br /> cargo handling, that shipment of scrap is on the decline, and that <br /> continued improvement of old docks is necessary also. <br /> Councilman Rhodes stated for the record that he would like to have the <br /> Port Budget reflect at least a token amount to be paid to the City's <br /> General Fund in order to indicate to citizens that the Port is an asset <br /> to the City. <br /> Jnt.Mtg. on% <br /> CC/Port <br /> 7/6/81 <br /> Page 2 <br /> i <br />