My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 01-07 to 12-15-1980
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1980-1989
>
1980
>
CC MIN 01-07 to 12-15-1980
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2015 2:51:27 PM
Creation date
3/18/2015 1:20:03 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/7/1980
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
302
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
AGENDA (continued) ACTION TAKEN (continued) 2 3 3 <br /> REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS (continued) REPORTS OF BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS (continued) <br /> 2. (continued) (1) Compelled Inclusion of Mobile Homes in <br /> Single Family Zones - SB 1960 - OPPOSE <br /> (2) Preemption of Billboard Regulation - <br /> SB 462 - OPPOSE <br /> (3) Condominium Conversion Purchase Require- <br /> ments - SB 1838 - OPPOSE <br /> (4) Annexation Impasse Resolution - AB 2376 - <br /> SUPPORT <br /> 0." (5) Local Option Gas Tax - SB 1505 - OPPOSE <br /> (6) Brown Act, Amendments re Agenda <br /> Iwo Materials - SB 1850 - OPPOSE <br /> (7) Limitations Upon Dedication of Public <br /> Rights-of-Way - SCA 39 - OPPOSE <br /> Carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> (MINUTE ORDER NO. 80-79) <br /> 3. Planning Commission recommendation re re- Report of City Manager 5/29/80 <br /> request of Ampex Corporation for vacation Planning Commission record transmitted 5/21/80 <br /> of easement <br /> Title read. M/S: Leipzig/Bury <br /> RESOLUTION OF INTENTION TO VACATE SPUR RESOLUTION NO. 8599 adopted; and <br /> TRACK EASEMENTS (AMPEX CORPORATION) public hearing set for June 23, 1980 <br /> unanimously by roll call vote. <br /> REPORTS OF CITY MANAGER REPORTS OF CITY MANAGER <br /> 4. Police and Fire Department Permit Fees Solicitor and Peddler; Massage Technician; <br /> and Taxi Driver Permit Fees (a., b., c.) <br /> a. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 18A.14 OF THE Report of City Manager 5/29/80 <br /> REDWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO MASSAGE Report of Chief of Police 5/29/80 <br /> TECHNICIAN PERMIT FEES Revisions to Public Dance Ordinance (d.) <br /> b. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTION 28.4.1 OF THE Report of City Manager 5/29/80 <br /> Report of Chief of Police 5/28/80 <br /> REDWOOD CITY CODE RELATING TO AN INCREASE <br /> IN IDENTIFICATION PERMIT FEES Fire Prevention Permit Fee Schedule (e. , f.) <br /> Report of City Manager 5/29/80 <br /> .^- <br /> C. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 33.33 AND Report of Director of Fire Services 5/28/80 <br /> 33.38 OF THE REDWOOD CITY CODE RELATING <br /> TO AN INCREASE IN DRIVERS' PERMIT FEES City Manager Fales advised that Proposition"wad approved by the voters last year and which <br /> d. ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 4.15, 4.17, becomes effective July 1, 1980, stated that <br /> 4.18, 4.19, 4.21, AND 4.24 OF, ADDING governments should review and calculate the <br /> SECTIONS 4.22, 4.25, 4.26 AND 4.27 TO, cost of services provided to individuals or <br /> AND REPEALING SECTION 4.22 OF, THE CODE G <br /> OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY RELATING TO groups. Mr. Fales said that the proposed <br /> THE REGULATION OF PUBLIC DANCES IN permit fees represent an attempt to equalize <br /> REDWOOD CITY costs which would otherwise be borne by <br /> general taxpayers. <br /> e. ORDINANCE ADDING SECTION 12.12.1 TO THE Dennis L. Woodman, 211 Marshall Street, attorney, <br /> CODE OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY PROVIDING requested that the subject Agenda item be <br /> FOR FEES FOR PERMITS REQUIRED PURSUANT TO continued to allow time for review of the <br /> THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE recommendations and examination and comparison <br /> with existing concerned ien. Mr. Woodman stated that <br /> f. RESOLUTION ADOPTING FEE SCHEDULE FOR PER- ti <br /> some of his clients are �:oncerned about how <br /> MITS REQUIRED BY THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE they may be affected, and he suggested there <br /> may be certain areas of State preemption of <br /> fields involved. <br /> Reg.Mtg. <br /> 6/2/00 <br /> Page 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.