Laserfiche WebLink
361 <br /> AGENDA (continued) ACTION TAKEN (continued <br /> CONSENT CALENDAR CONSENT CALENDAR <br /> In response to request and there being no <br /> ling objection, Mayor Biagi ordered that item No. 8 <br /> be considered separately. <br /> M/S: Chandler/Rhodes to waive reading of the <br /> Consent Calendar, adopt the resolutions and <br /> approve all other items. <br /> Carried unanimously by roll call vote. <br /> 8. See below for Council action. <br /> 9. MOTION: to extend expiration date of sub- MINUTE ORDER NO. 80-155 <br /> division agreement, Parcel Map 79-10 - <br /> Peninsula Marina <br /> 10. MOTION: to grant easement from San Mateo MINUTE ORDER NO. 80-156 <br /> County to Redwood City for GID No. 1-64 <br /> projects (water transmission line, etc.) <br /> 11. RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE FUR- RESOLUTION NO. 8699 <br /> NISHING OF SELF-PROPELLED VACUUM SWEEPER; <br /> AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR THE <br /> FURNISHING THEREOF <br /> 12. RESOLUTION AWARDING CONTRACT FOR THE FUR- RESOLUTION NO. 8700 <br /> NISHING OF TWO ROTARY LAWN MOWERS; AUTHORI- <br /> ZING EXECUTION OF AGREEMENT FOR THE FURNISH- <br /> THEREOF; AND REJECTING ALL OTHER BIDS <br /> 13. RESOLUTION APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING EXECU- RESOLUTION NO. 8701 <br /> ..e. TION OF AGREEMENT WITH THE TARGET EDUCATION <br /> AND WELFARE COUNCIL, INC. <br /> 14. Approval of warrant nos. 1934 through 2132; Approved <br /> and authorizing usual and necessary payment <br /> of bills through October 6, 1980 <br /> 15. Council requests to attend meetings, if any None <br /> 8. MOTION: to authorize issuance of Report of City Manager 9/18/80 <br /> directional sign permit - Peninsula Report of Building Official 9/10/80 <br /> Boardwalk (see above) <br /> Councilman Chandler stated for the record that <br /> he opposes placing a private sign on City <br /> property and suggested it might be a traffic <br /> hazard. <br /> Discussion followed and Planning Director <br /> Schroeter replied to questions concerning the <br /> intent of Council direction of June 23, 1980 <br /> (Minute Order No. 80-94); the size of the <br /> presently proposed sign (3'6"x8') as compared <br /> to the size originally requested (6'6" x 10'5"); <br /> the fact that the sign will be 5'6" above <br /> grade, with two feet of the height being the <br /> pedestal; and whether the sign can be expected <br /> to obscure the new bridge. <br /> Councilman Leipzig stated she will abstain <br /> from voting, having been asked to provide a <br /> Reg.Mtg. <br /> 9/22/80 <br /> __ Page 6 <br /> i1r w <br />