Res04 14590 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 16 May 16, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 MOB... JRING VERIFIC#, ION IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE Impl. Type of Impl. Monitoring and Timing Signature Date (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Verification Entity Requirements ihat volumes on the Whipple Avenue to another through travel lane, with a capacity five years after Woodside Road segment exceed its capacity. of 2,300 vehicles per lane per hour, would full project The project is expected to increase volumes more than offset the addition of project buildout by more than one percent of the freeway traffic (the project is expected to add 127 segment's capacity during the PM peak hour. trips to this freeway segment). However, This effect would represent a significant freeway widening is generally considered to impact. be beyond the scope of a single development project- -i.e., an infeasible mitigation requirement. Therefore, the effect of project traffic on this freeway segment is considered to represent a significant unavoidable impact (i.e., would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). Impact 7 -6: Project Impact on Eastbound Mitigation 7 -6. The project shall minimize Applicant/ Implement TDM City Formulate SR 84, Willow Road to University Avenue impacts on this freeway segment by City program (incl. program prior to and University Avenue to the County Line implementing a transportation demand annual report). tentative map/ Segments - -PM Peak Hour. C /CAG's 2001 management (TDM) program, as described development San Mateo CMP Monitoring Report under Mitigation 7 -2. agreement determined that these freeway segments approval; annual currently operate at LOS F- -i.e., existing Full mitigation of this impact (i.e., to less- City review of volumes exceed both segments' capacities in than- significant level) would require the TDM program the PM peak hour (even after the planned addition of another eastbound through lane annual report widening is completed). Volumes are to both segments. The addition of another continuing for expected to continue to exceed the segments' through travel lane, with a capacity of 1,100 five years after capacity under Background and Project vehicles per lane per hour, would more than full project Conditions. The project is expected to offset the addition of project traffic (the buildout increase volumes by more than one percent of project is expected to add 58 trips to the each segment's capacity during the PM peak segments). However, freeway widening is hour. This effect would represent a generally considered to be beyond the significant impact. scope of a single development project- -i.e., an infeasible mitigation requirement. Therefore, the effect of project traffic on these segments is considered to represent a significant unavoidable impact (i.e., would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). Impact 7 -7: Transit Accessibility Impact. Mitigation 7 -7. Implement Mitigation 4 -3. Applicant/ Implement City Prior to Precise Mitigation 4 -3 in the Land Use chapter of this As part of or in addition to that mitigation, City Mitigation 4 -3. Plan adoption EIR calls for establishment of a convenient the project shall accommodate on -site or Accommodate on- transit Ink between the project and local and contribute its fair share to a bus tum- around site or contribute regional express transit corridors and/or hubs, in the Bair Island Road area to allow for fair -share to bus Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 16 May 16, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645