Res04 14590 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 15 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645 MOi i ORING VERIFICA NON IDENTIFIED IMPACT RELATED MITIGATION MEASURE ImpL Type of Impl. Monitoring and Timing Signature Date (CONDITION OF APPROVAL) Entity Action Verification Entity Requirements freeway widening is generally considered to be beyond the scope of a single development project- -i.e., an infeasible mitigation requirement. Therefore, the effect of project traffic on this freeway segment is considered to represent a significant unavoidable impact (i.e., would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). Impact 7 -4: Project Impact on Westbound Mitigation 7 -4. The project shall minimize Applicant/ Implement TDM City Formulate SR 84, County Line to University Avenue impacts on these two freeway segments by City program (incl. program prior to and University Avenue to Willow Road implementing a transportation demand annual report). tentative map/ Segments - -AM Peak Hour. C /CAG's 2001 management (TDM) program, as described development San Mateo CMP Monitoring Report under Mitigation 7 -2. agreement determined that these two freeway segments approval; annual currently operate at LOS F- -i.e., the existing Full mitigation of this impact (i.e., to a less- City review of volumes exceed both segments' capacities, in than - significant level) would require the TDM program the AM peak hour (even after the planned addition of another westbound through lane annual report widening is completed). Volumes are to both segments. The addition of another continuing lot expected to continue to exceed the segments' through travel lane, with a design capacity of five years after capacity under Background and Project 1,100 vehicles per lane per hour, would full project Conditions. The project is expected to more than offset the addition of project buildout increase volumes by more than one percent of traffic (the project is expected to add 57 trips each segment's capacity during the AM peak to the segments). However, freeway hour. This effect would represent a widening is generally considered to be significant impact. beyond the scope of a single development project- -i.e., an infeasible mitigation requirement. Therefore, the effect of project traffic on these segments is considered to represent a significant unavoidable impact (i.e., would require City adoption of a Statement of Overriding Considerations). Impact 7 -5: Project Impact on U.S. 101 Mitigation 7 -5. The project shall minimize Applicant/ Implement TDM City Formulate Southbound Mixed -Flow Lanes, Whipple impacts on this freeway segment by City program (incl. program prior to Avenue to Woodside Road Segment - -PM implementing a transportation demand annual report). tentative map/ Peak Hour. C /CAG's 2001 San Mateo CMP management (TDM) program, as described development Monitoring Report determined that the under Mitigation 7 -2. agreement segment of this freeway between Whipple approval; annual Avenue and the county line currently operates Full mitigation of this impact (i.e., to a less- City review of at LOS D, an acceptable level. However, the than- significant level) would require the TDM program capacity analysis in this El for Existing, addition of another southbound through lane annual report Background, and Project Conditions indicated to the freeway segment. The addition of continuing for Legend. Applicant = project applicant, City = City of Redwood City Page 15 May 18, 2004 WP9.016451MMCHT.645