Laserfiche WebLink
7.1.B. - Page 21 <br /> obligations under this Agreement and which result from the <br /> negligent or wrongful acts of each City or its officers, employees, <br /> or agents, including, but not limited to, those claims, suits, or <br /> actions arising from activities performed by the County as a <br /> representative of the City as set forth in Sections 3.6 and 4.2. <br /> b. The County shall hold harmless, indemnify and defend each City, <br /> its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all <br /> claims, suits or actions of any kind brought for or on account of <br /> injuries to or death of any person or damage to any property of <br /> any kind and to whomsoever belonging which arise out of the <br /> performance or non-performance of the County's obligations <br /> under this Agreement and which result from the negligent or <br /> wrongful acts of the County, its officers or employees. This <br /> provision requiring the County to hold harmless, indemnify and <br /> defend each City shall expressly not apply to claims, losses, <br /> liabilities or damages arising from actions or omissions, negligent <br /> or otherwise, of the Animal Control Contractor or the Animal <br /> Licensing Contractor, or their officers, employees or agents, under <br /> the services agreements with the County. Further, this provision <br /> requiring the County to hold harmless, indemnify and defend each <br /> City shall not apply to acts or omissions of the County done on <br /> behalf of each City in performing administrative tasks for the <br /> convenience of each City as set forth in Sections 3.6 and 4.2. <br /> c. In the event of concurrent negligence of the County, its officer or <br /> employees, and the City, its officers and employees, the liability <br /> for any and all claims for injuries or damages to persons and/or <br /> property or any other loss or costs which arise out of the terms, <br /> conditions, covenants or responsibilities of this agreement shall <br /> be apportioned according to the California theory of comparative <br /> negligence. <br /> d. Finally, Parties acknowledge that with respect to activities <br /> performed by the Animal Control Contractor or the Animal <br /> Licensing Contractor in the Cities' territorial limits, the County <br /> serves solely as a Contract Administrator and solely with respect <br /> to the specific obligations contained within this Agreement and the <br /> agreements between the County and the Animal Control <br /> Contractor and the Animal Licensing Contractor. Accordingly, in <br /> the event the County or the Cities are sued and the suit is related <br /> in any manner to actions taken by the Animal Control Contractor <br /> or the Animal Licensing Contractor solely in a particular City or the <br /> Cities, the particular City or Cities, as the case may be, will hold <br /> harmless, indemnify and defend the County, and any other City <br /> that is named as a defendant in that suit from and against any and <br /> 17IPage February 5 , 2015 <br /> ATTY/AGR/2015.057/SAN MATEO COUNTY-ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES <br />