Laserfiche WebLink
7.1.D. - Page 42 <br /> high turnover in its population due to the large student population that resides there. Thus, <br /> neither one of these jurisdictions is necessarily a good one to draw conclusions from when <br /> evaluating whether there are differences in participation based on Party ID or ethnicity. <br /> Table Wessac VIIIB: Participation by Party Id by Vote Method, S07 and S13 <br /> party s07 n patot prtot party s13 n patot prtot <br /> AIP 85 15.57 18.44 Al 34 4.28 4.47 <br /> AIP A 55 10.07 11.93 Al A 134 16.86 17.61 <br /> AIP N 382 69.96 82.86 Al N 627 78.87 82.39 <br /> AIP V 24 4.4 5.21 <br /> DEM 1016 10.47 11.69 DEM _ 156 1.57 1.59 <br /> DEM A 1512 15.58 17.4 DEM A 2840 28.51 28.96 <br /> DEM N 6335 65.26 72.89 DEM _ N 6967 69.93 71.04 <br /> DEM V 844 8.69 9.71 <br /> GRN 14 8.64 9.46 GRN 5 3.45 3.57 <br /> GRN A 14 8.64 9.46 GRN A 32 22.07 22.86 <br /> GRN N 124 76.54 83.78 GRN N 108 74.48 77.14 <br /> GRN V 10 6.17 6.76 <br /> LIB 5 7.25 7.81 LIB 3 2.36 2.42 <br /> LIB A 9 13.04 14.06 LIB A 23 18.11 18.55 <br /> LIB N 52 75.36 81.25 LIB N 101 79.53 81.45 <br /> LIB V 3 4.35 4.69 <br /> NP 564 12.81 14.69 NPP 155 2.94 3.02 <br /> NP A 420 9.54 10.94 NPP A 1028 19.47 20.05 <br /> NP N 3154 71.62 82.14 NPP N 4098 77.6 79.95 <br /> NP V 266 6.04 6.93 <br /> PF 7 2.89 2.98 PF 20 13.33 15.38 <br /> PF A 8 3.31 3.4 PF A 20 13.33 15.38 <br /> PF N 223 92.15 94.89 PF N 110 73.33 84.62 <br /> PF V 4 1.65 1.7 <br /> REP 468 8.19 8.93 REP 71 1.23 1.24 <br /> REP A 957 16.76 18.25 REP A 1438 24.88 25.19 <br /> REP N 3790 66.36 72.29 REP N 4270 73.89 74.81 <br /> REP V 496 8.68 9.46 <br /> MIS 3 2.48 2.54 <br /> MIS A 18 14.88 15.25 <br /> MIS N 100 82.64 84.75 <br /> 36 <br />