Laserfiche WebLink
Page 3 of 3 <br />meetings and teleconferences, additional administrative costs related to an extension of <br />the specific plan timeline and public review of the environmental impact report. <br /> <br />The recommended scope of work and consultant effort is $553,317. This includes the <br />original $59,885 agreement, the $365,848 for the expanded scope in Amendment <br />Number 1 and $127,584 for the additional tasks, administrative costs and contingency <br />amount for Amendment Number 2. <br /> <br />ALTERNATIVES <br />The City Council could choose to not fund the additional work and direct staff to either <br />re-negotiate the Agreement or select another consultant team and negotiate an <br />Agreement with it. <br /> <br />FISCAL IMPACT <br />Funding for the activities covered in this amendment is available in the FY 2014-15 <br />adopted budget, as amended by the FY15 mid-year budget request. <br /> <br /> <br />ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br />The City of Redwood City has determined that the proposed activity is not a project as <br />defined in the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) or the CEQA Guidelines. <br /> <br /> <br />STEVEN TURNER <br />PLANNING MANAGER <br /> <br /> <br />AARON AKNIN <br />ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER <br /> <br /> <br />ROBERT B. BELL <br />CITY MANAGER <br /> <br />ATTACHMENTS <br />1. MIG INNER HARBOR CONTRACT AMENDMENT NO. 2 <br />7.1.G. - Page 3