My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 2004-05-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2000-2009
>
2004
>
CC Min 2004-05-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/6/2011 2:53:38 PM
Creation date
6/17/2004 10:26:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Date
5/10/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
n. <br />ORDINANCE 1130 -331 OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY <br />AMENDING ORDINANCE NO. 1130 TO AMEND SECTION 2.41 OF ARTICLE 2- <br />DEFINITIONS, OF THE REDWOOD CITY ZONING CODE RELATED TO FLOOR AREA <br />RATIOS TO PERMIT A FLOOR AREA RATIO EXEMPTION FOR CERTAIN CHILDCARE <br />FACILITIES (first reading on April 26, 2004) <br />6.4 Section — Claims and Warrants <br />A. Approve warrants dated through May 10, 2004 and usual and necessary payments <br />through May 24, 2004; (301) MINUTE ORDER 04 -89 <br />M/S Howard /Pierce to adjourn the Redevelopment Agency meeting. The motion <br />passed by a unanimous voice vote. <br />7. PUBLIC HEARINGS <br />A. Appeal of the Zoning Administrator's approval of a Planned Development <br />Amendment at 2 Dillon Lane to allow for a second story balcony addition to an <br />existing two -story single family residence located in the Valota Place Planned <br />Development (item continued from March 22, 2004)) (603) <br />Mayor Ira stated that the public hearing on this topic was closed on March 22, <br />2004 and that this item had been continued by Council in order to receive <br />additional information from staff. <br />Associate Planner Lyon_stated he was presenting additional considerations for the <br />2 Dillon Lane appeal. On March 22, the public hearing was closed and the item <br />continued for 60 days to provide the opportunity to clarify the criteria within the <br />zoning ordinance with respect to planned development amendments, and <br />secondly, to obtain some additional historical background information on the <br />project. He continued to explain the criteria associated with planned development <br />amendments. <br />Council Members asked various questions of staff and made comments. <br />M/S Bain /Ruskin to uphold the appeal and do not allow the balcony to be built. The <br />motion failed by the following vote: Ayes: Council Members Bain, Ruskin and <br />Mayor Ira. Noes: Council Members Foust, Hartnett, Howard and Vice Mayor <br />Pierce. <br />JOINT CITY COUNCIL AND REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MAY 10, 2004 <br />MEETING MINUTES PAGE 7 <br />MINUTES Book No. 60 <br />Page No. 213 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.