CC Min 1996-05-13 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

thought they were beautiful and unique.....He now leans to the side of removing them either at once or graduaIly....only so that the money it would take to go into the planters, renewing the planters,....only so that money can create an opportunity to redesign the areas where the planters are, so that more money could be put into benches and more attractive artifacts, more attractive street furniture, ....and eventually into lighting." Mayor Hartnett called upon those people in the audience who wished to speak to this Issue: Wendy Fleming, 185 Woodsworth Avenue, Redwood City, spoke about the historical feeling the mature, stately, leafy trees bring to the City, and recommended that gradual removal and replanting be done only if necessary. Enid Brock, 1837 Brewster, Redwood City, also spoke about historical preservation and how beautiful the mature, leafy trees in the downtown area were. Mrs. Brock said she would hate to see marginal money used for trash cans. She said trees are a historical investment and Redwood City should shy away from the "design dujour" concept. Don Saye, 2021 Broadway, Redwood City, spoke in favor of the mature, leafy trees which make the downtown unique, and said that some planters were salvageable. He said there were 9 broken planters that would have to be replaced along with their trees. Mr. Saye urged the Council to retain as many of the mature trees as possible. In response to Council questions, City Arborist Gordon Mann, said there were 17 trees and planter boxes which were replaced and are in good shape, and 28 remaining in the Maltese Cross planter boxes that need attention. All the trees, except 4-5 possibly, either in the ground or in planter boxes should survive the sidewalk replacement project. Arborist Mann said similar trees in other parts of the City are long-lived, and the downtown trees could be expected to continue to grow within the amount of space provided. In 10 to 20 years some replacement would have to take place because they would simply become too big. They would be replaced with available trees, which if replacement was done now would be between 13' and 18' tall and 6' and 10' in crown spread, similar to Main Street. Arborist Mann added that the amount of utilities in the ground would affect what kind and how many trees could be put into the ground. Councilman Ruskin added that he and Arborist Mann drove the area to see the impact of the old, leafy trees on Broadway and the younger, smaller ones on Main, which do not offer nearly as much shade as those on Broadway. In response to Council questions, Arborist Mann explained that the trees on Broadway are the highest maintained trees in the City and are being kept artificially small, and the City crews "manicure" the trees to keep them at this size. However, they will continue to grow, and at some point the root mass will force the replacement of the impacted trees. Arborist Mann said that between 5 and 20 years the trees will have to be replaced, because "we can't keep using bigger and bigger planters.....We've already gotten five years out of MINUTE BOOK NO. 54 Regular Meeting Minutes Page No. 234 May 13, 1996 Page 11