My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1996-06-10
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1996
>
CC Min 1996-06-10
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:46:41 PM
Creation date
6/17/2004 2:49:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Agency Type
City Council
Date
6/10/1996
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
23
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br /> artificially low in the past "by raising general taxes and transferring those funds into <br /> the water fund to supplement the water funds losses." Proposition 13 stopped that <br /> operation as it required government entities to run enterprise funds without profit but <br /> with reasonable reserves. <br /> In response to Councilman Leipzig's questions regarding Options I and 3, Director <br /> Ingram described Attachment 8, a spread sheet showing revenues and amounts going <br /> into the emergency reserves through the second year, for Options I and 3, and the goal <br /> of$2 million at the end of year 2. Option 3 would take 3 years to reach the $2 million. <br /> Director Ingram said that Option 3 "is basically the status quo." In response to <br /> questions regarding the utility users tax, Director Ingram said that "the in-lieu charge <br /> that is assessed against enterprise funds is a common practice....It is a way to <br /> essentially make the general fund good for revenues it would receive if we were <br /> actually a private utiIity....The basis for our own in-lieu is, we assess on a formula <br /> basis each year on estimated revenues put into place in the budget and <br /> essentially....what would be a 5% utility user tax and a guestimated 4% franchise fee." <br /> He added that the foundation for that process was set in Proposition 13 language. <br /> Director Ingram said the utility users tax "has nothing to do with this." <br /> In response to Vice Mayor Howard's questions, Director Ingram said that Option 3 <br /> "would not help the lower users and would not encourage the high users to <br /> save....LifeIine would stay at $ .89." Vice Mayor Howard said Option No.1 was <br /> prudent and fair. <br /> Councilman Ruskin said he supported Option No. I for two reasons: It will enhance <br /> conservation; and it prepares the City for the increases that will come in two years. <br /> a) MIS: CLAIREIHOWARD TITLE READ. <br /> RESOLUTION NO. 12797 AMENDING SECTION 3 OF THE RULES AND <br /> REGULATIONS OF THE REDWOOD CITY WATER DEPARTMENT (PUBLIC <br /> WORKS SERVICES DEPARTMENT) RELATING TO WATER RATES; AND <br /> RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 12209 (OPTION NO.1) <br /> ADOPTED BY THE FOLLOWING ROLL CALL VOTE: <br /> AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS BUCHAN, CLAIRE, HOWARD, <br /> LA BERGE, RUSKIN AND MAYOR HARTNETT <br /> NOES: COUNCILMAN LEIPZIG <br /> b) MIS: BUCHAN/LA BERGE. TITLE READ. FIRST READING. <br /> ORDINANCE AMENDING SECTIONS 38.5 AND 38.14 OF CHAPTER 38 OF THE <br /> CODE OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY TO REVISE WATER SERVICE <br /> CHARGES AND THE DESIGNATION OF DEPARTMENTAL AUTHORITY, <br /> RESPECTIVELY <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 54 <br /> Page No. 274 <br /> MINUTES JUNE 10, 1996 <br /> REGULAR MEETING PAGE 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.