Laserfiche WebLink
<br /> EIR does include an alternative analysis on site, the Sedway report refers to alternative <br /> sites. <br /> Vice Mayor Hartnett discussed the errata sheets being near the tail end of the process <br /> and City Attorney Schricker stated that it is part of the procedure to refine and <br /> respond further to clarify issues. <br /> In response to a question from Mayor Gasparini to Mr. Torrey about whether any of <br /> the 7 speakers raised any new issues at this meeting that were not responded to at some <br /> level and his response was no. The errata sheet cleared up some issues but did not <br /> change the basic conclusions and or back up analysis of the EIR. <br /> In response to a question from City Attorney Schricker, Christine Schneider <br /> responded that the errata sheet was prepared in March. <br /> Vice Mayor Hartnett emphasized that the appellants and their representatives did <br /> state a number of interesting points. The discussion in reference to incompatible land <br /> uses are well taken but he agrees with the conclusion of staff and the attorney that there <br /> needs to be a differentiation between policy issues from the EIR. The EIR does make <br /> reference to the incompatibilities and clearly states that it is certainly possible that if <br /> the project is built there will be pressure on the existing businesses there because of <br /> incompatible use. When it gets to the merit of the project this issue will be looked at <br /> very carefully. The EIR as a document does provide sufficient information within the <br /> guidelines. The document looks 99% OK from a legal point of view except for one <br /> issue regarding the incorporation of the Sedway study. The executive summary of the <br /> study should have been included in the report even though the report is incorporated by <br /> reference. <br /> 4) Close public hearing <br /> MIS: BUCHAN/SANFILIPO TO CLOSE THE PUBLIC HEARING AT 11 :08 P.M. <br /> CARRIED BY UNANIMOUS VOICE VOTE. <br /> 5) Council action <br /> MIS HARTNETT /LA BERGE to stay appeal and pending the stay remand the EIR to <br /> the Planning Commission for the purpose of including the executive summary of the <br /> Sedway study in the EIR. The EIR will then come back to Council on the appeal and <br /> that the EIR not be re-circulated. <br /> Councilman Sanfilipo requested further information on whether the executive <br /> summary was part of the entire report that was in the list of references in the EIR. <br /> Planning Director Patterson stated that the document was not included with the draft <br /> EIR it was incorporated by reference with copies in the Planning Department. <br /> Regular Meeting Minutes <br /> May 8, 1995 MINUTE BOOK NO. 53 <br /> Page 12 Page No. 171 <br /> ---. -- <br />