My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC Min 1995-07-17 Stdy
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1990-1999
>
1995
>
CC Min 1995-07-17 Stdy
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/5/2005 2:47:47 PM
Creation date
7/2/2004 3:21:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Date
7/17/1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />Larry Patterson of Patterson Associates, Traffic Engineers, discussed the development within <br />the context of traffic impacts, congestion and mitigation. Mr. Patterson described the regional <br />and local views of more congestion on Highway 101 and Woodside Road and that interchange, <br />and advised mitigation efforts would be needed. <br />Paul Sedway of Sedway Kotin Mouchly addressed the concerns that the proposed <br />development was incompatible with the heavy industrial companies already established in the <br />area. Mr. Sedway described several similar sites that were analyzed and stated that <br />compatibility was a non-issue, that suitable placement, access, buffering and landscaping <br />mitigated any problems associated with operating heavy manufacturing or industrial plants next <br />to restaurants, strip malls or office complexes. <br />John Sanger, Sanger & Olson Attorneys, explained why the developers wanted the Council to <br />"prezone" the County land before annexation to the City: it would give a strong signal to the <br />developers that the City supported the project. <br />Yvonne Rizak, Ashwood Court, San Mateo, provided more background on this 3.5 year long <br />project, emphasizing that environmental concerns were their highest priorities and had been <br />addressed. Ms. Rizak described the redesigning that took place after listening to neighbor's <br />concerns, the proposed beautiful park, sports facility involving local sports organizations, art <br />and cultural activities and the benefits of having high tech headquarters in Redwood City. <br />Project Manager Brandon wrapped up the presentations by stressing that change is difficult <br />but this development would benefit the whole City. Mr. Brandon suggested a facilitator be <br />hired to work with the proposed development's neighbors and the Port Tenants to resolve <br />compatibility issues. <br />Board of Port Commissioners Chairman Dodge presented a formal statement supporting the <br />Pacific Shores Center development based on the developers efforts to meet and satisfy the <br />reasonable concerns of the Port's tenants. Chairman Dodge added that the 10 acres of land the <br />development would make available for port expansion would be very beneficial and necessary <br />for the Port's future. Chairman Dodge said mitigation efforts would have to be significant but <br />felt with the developer's long term commitment to a quality project, the Pacific Shores Center <br />would be a major milestone for the Port and the City. <br />Mark Adams of Sims-Linc Recyclers, spoke on behalf of a group of tenants and landowners at <br />the Port of Redwood City, including Lone Star, Lyngso, Bell Marine and Granite Rock. Mr. <br />Adams stated that their businesses were booming and not declining as had been represented by <br />an earlier speaker. Mr. Adams advised that their objections to this development were based on <br />inappropriate land use, and the proposed mitigations would never completely address their <br />concerns. Mr. Adams stated the proposed development would hinder and limit their <br />commercial activities, and when the developers were asked to indemnify the tenants and <br />landowners Mr. Brandon said no. Mr. Adams advised that the developers had been <br />unresponsive to their concerns, and they wanted a clear signal from the Council that the area <br />east of 101 on Seaport Boulevard would remain zoned for industrial use. <br /> Special Adjourned Council Meeting, Study Session Minutes <br />[INUTE BOOK NO. 53 July 17, 1995 <br />age No. 266 Page 3 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.