My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 2015-04-13
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
CC MIN 2015-04-13
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/13/2017 10:32:44 AM
Creation date
10/20/2015 9:25:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
4/13/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
environmental review, and level of difficulty with the process. He added that the <br /> Planning Commission recommended that the ordinance be adopted. <br /> Councit Member Howard asked about the review that was done for what other cities and <br /> counties have already done. She asked why Redwood City was likened to 5an Carlos. <br /> Mr. Aknin replied that San Carlos has a Floor Area Ratio but it's an FAR for further <br /> review. <br /> Council Member Bain asked for a definition of 15% slope. Ms. O'Dell, Principal Planner, <br /> sated that the code's definition for the slope measures the slope of the lot over the <br /> entire lot. One portion of the lot can be very steep and another portion can be quite flat, <br /> but the average slope may be close to 15%. A gradual 15% slope across an entire lot <br /> would have the same percentage. She noted this has been an existing definition for <br /> some time. Council Member Bain gave an example for clarification. He asked Mr. <br /> Aknin to define what types of items fall under the Architectural Review. Mr. Aknin stated <br /> that it is the house in its entirety, such as how much is being excavated, how big the <br /> home is, but not things like the color of the home. He asked what happens for <br /> homeowners who are out of compliance. Mr. Aknin stated that if there were changes, <br /> there could be an interior remodel but not something that would increase the degree of <br /> nonconformity. <br /> Mayor Gee asked if Staff is recommending a limit on square footage of homes and Mr. <br /> Aknin replied that they are not. Mayor Gee stated that there will still be 40% lot <br /> coverage maximums on homes built in RH, R-1, and R-2, with no Floor Area Ratio <br /> limitation. Mr. Aknin replied that is correct. Right now, new construction requires a PD <br /> which opens up all the regulations to discussion; this proposal will keep hillsides from <br /> requiring a PD. Council Member Bain asked if there is a chart showing how many <br /> nonconforming homes are on slopes of 15% or more. Staff said that particular chart had <br /> not been created. <br /> Mayor Gee opened the Public Hearing and the Council heard public Comment. <br /> Rodger Wilson asked how much the City paid to have a report on this. Mayor Gee <br /> stated that the contract is in the public record. Mr. Wilson stated that the Council should <br /> have that information tonight. He noted that he attended the first workshop and did not <br /> feel there was good participation and that it was not conducted properly. He stated that <br /> he does not understand what the problems are with the current regulations. <br /> Patricia Sankey-Ro doni noted that she believed she lived in Emerald Hills which is <br /> unincorporated but was told recently she is actually in Redwood City. She asked if it's <br /> possible to get some information on subdividing a property under this ordinance. She <br /> sees bigger homes than hers on lots smaller than hers. <br /> Deanna Lesea stated that her concern is how it would impact the ability to sell her <br /> property if it were labeled as nonconforming. <br /> Deborah Henken thanked the City Council for working on this issue. She noted that she <br /> supports hillside regulations but is concerned about how slope will affect decisions <br /> JOINT CITY COUNCIL/SUCCESSOR AGENCY BOARD/ April 13, 2015 <br /> PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY MEETING MINUTES PAGE 10 <br /> MINUTE BOOK NO. 65 <br /> Page No. 367 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.