My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2015-10-26 Study and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
AgdaPkt 2015-10-26 Study and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
11/17/2015 10:03:49 AM
Creation date
10/22/2015 7:26:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
10/26/2015
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
401
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
7.A. - Page 4 <br /> Commercial Nexus Studies. A summary of the steps is shown in Figure 2; however, the <br /> steps vary slightly between the commercial and residential studies. <br /> FIGURE 2: NEXUS STUDY METHODOLOGY (GENERALIZED) <br /> 1. Estimate demand for 2. Estimate demand for <br /> workers of various wage affordable housing from new <br /> levels created by typical <br /> development. worker households. <br /> 4. Using the gap, calculate 3. Determine the gap between <br /> the maximum fee for worker's ability to pay and <br /> different development market rents. <br /> types. <br /> Impact fees lessen the impact of new individual development projects; they do not <br /> address existing or longstanding affordable housing issues outside of a particular <br /> development. As the fee is based on the additional low-income workers needed by new <br /> residents and employees, the funds are to be used on workforce housing. <br /> Common Concerns with Affordable Housing Fees: There are two common concerns <br /> with adopting affordable housing impact fees: <br /> 1. The fee cost will be passed on to residents, raising rents and sales prices. <br /> 2. The fee will discourage new development by making new construction too <br /> expensive. <br /> One concern is that the fee cost will be passed on to market-rate residents in the form <br /> of higher rents or sales prices, undercutting the purpose of the fee. Staff reviewed this <br /> concern with consultants assisting with the nexus study. The consultants provided <br /> information that in a competitive real estate environment affordable housing impact fees <br /> do not raise housing prices. The overall market sets the rental or sales price and <br /> developers cannot raise prices even if their costs go up, regardless of the reason. <br /> Inversely, if development costs go down, rent or sales prices do not generally drop <br /> below the market rate. Increased development cost typically results in lower land prices <br /> as opposed to a higher market rent or sales price. For this reason, the feasibility <br /> analysis is crucial to setting a fee level that does not inhibit new construction and <br /> economic development, (i.e. that developers can still profitably buy land), and ideally is <br /> somewhat in line with surrounding cities. <br /> This feasibility analysis was incorporated into the Redwood City Nexus Studies. While <br /> the actual nexus analysis establishes the maximum legally-justified fee, the feasibility <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.