CC Min 1995-12-04 Stdy - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

Mayor Hartnett stated that the two main issues are cost and design integrity. He stated that the bidding process that staff is fine tuning provides the best competitive bidding and quality work, and it was important to continue it. He advised that Council set construction costs at 7.5 million, and if there is an expectation that the design integrity is going to be fundamentally changed to accomplish that budget, then the Council, as the ultimate guardians, would make the decision as to what gets changed and what does not. Mayor Hartnett agreed with Councilman Claire that the interest from the Utilities Users tax set aside for the City Hall Project and not used yet, should be devoted to the City Hall Project. He advised that the market is heating up and for no other reason than market forces should there be additional price increases, and it was reasonable to use that interest for the City Hall Project. Mayor Hartnett requested that the process provide that fundamental design issues be brought to the Council in a very clear and timely manner. Mayor Hartnett said he didn't care what was inside the walls as long as it worked and the quality was there. He stated he wanted to know what the building would look like for $7.5 million. Councilwoman La Berge said a City Hall should represent beauty and dignity. It was not an office building, but a reflection of the pride people have in their community. Councilwoman La Berge stated the decision was not just for today but for the generations to come. "It is for our children and our grandchildren and great grandchildren, it should be a real legacy." Councilwoman La Berge agreed that the interest should be included in the City Hall Project since the source was devoted to capital improvements. Councilwoman La Berge said she could support cutting back on some of the exterior brick and change the steel interior to steel bracing. She asked that an attractive tile roof, landscaping and expansion area above the Council Chamber be kept in the design. Councilwoman Buchan stated that this was a very important session, to revisit the whole City Hall issue and have the new Council come together to set a course for this project. Councilwoman Buchan said that Redwood City is changing but working class values still sustain the community and that will never change. She expressed support for the following requests: keep the Council Chambers, landscaping, and attractive roof. Councilwoman Buchan added that she agreed with Councilman Ruskin that it was important to see what the proposed changes would look like and she agreed with Mayor Hartnett that she didn't care what was in the wall as long as it was of quality. Vice Mayor Howard stated that Redwood City was growing and diverse. She reaffirmed the goal set by Council to provide more and effective communications to the community. She said the design of one-stop shopping in a City Hall the City could be proud of would meet that goal. Vice Mayor Howard stated that there had been over 200 responses from the community choosing the design and the City didn't usually get such a large response like that when it does something in the community, and these people took the time to write comments saying "this is what we want to see complement our Library" to tie it into a Civic Center with the San Mateo County Museum and the downtown. Vice Mayor Howard expressed support for the expansion area and landscaping, but was open to changes to the rounded glass, roof changes especially if the steel bracing was to be changed, and changes to the brick, except at critical points. She added that she would have MINUTE BOOK NO. 53 Special City Council Study Session Minutes Page No. 462 December 4, 1995 Page 9 --