My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
Res15 15461
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Resolutions
>
City Council
>
2010-2019
>
2015
>
Res15 15461
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/16/2015 11:33:20 AM
Creation date
12/16/2015 11:33:19 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Resolution
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
12/7/2015
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
12/07/2015 <br /> , 6.3.B. - Page 13 <br /> Z�''��` �► <br /> !Y t;i.:P"t;c,!`,�t.yrl� ,Ct.f4r^trbr�t..li-c <br /> Audience <br /> The goal was to identify places and reach residents and citizens in the City, as opposed to <br /> commuters and the business population. The target audience was adult residents and <br /> r'egistered voters in Redwood City. <br /> Materials <br /> The City of Redwood City prepared an informational brochure that promoted "voting from home" <br /> and served as a tutorial regarding the new process. In addition, the brochure listed the polling <br /> places in Redwood City. The consultant used this brochure to launch the discussions with <br /> Redwood City residents. In addition to the brochure, the City prepared 11x17 inch posters for <br /> display at Redwood City Starbucks stores and other businesses. The outreach consultant <br /> distributed approximately 1,800-2,000 brochures and 20 posters. <br /> Approach and Reach <br /> Given the resources available, the overall approach was for the outreach consultant to attend <br /> highly visible, well-attended public activities and engage with voters one-on-one or in small <br /> groups. The outreach consultant has a functional fluency with Spanish; thus, she was also able <br /> to converse with Spanish-language speakers. The consultant spoke to approximately 1,500- <br /> 2,000 people at a one-on-one level. <br /> The number of brochures distributed and the number of people engaged is not a direct <br /> correlation. Many more individuals were approached by the consultant than brochures <br /> distributed by the consultant; approximately 3:1. Some individuals would not take the brochure <br /> because by talking with the consultant, they had received the knowledge and information, or <br /> they knew they had the information at home. For every person who engaged in conversation or <br /> took the brochure to learn more learn about the new process, there were other individuals who <br /> shared that they already voted by mail or reacted as if the voting by mail was an option and they <br /> were not interested. <br /> Some of the questions asked: <br /> • "I received the sample ballot (or the reminder)when will I get my ballot" <br /> • "If I got to the polls do I have to bring my own ballot?" <br /> • "I like waiting until the last day because sometime candidates do something silly so I <br /> don't want to vote" <br /> • "Will it be like this forever, from now on?" <br /> • "How will they know the turnout—the age, who showed up, etc.?" <br /> • "How will I know that they received it and it was counted? ...will I receive an "I voted" <br /> sticker?" <br /> 3 <br /> Envirocom Communications Strategies, LLC— Summary Memorandum <br /> 9 RESO.#15461 <br /> MUFF#307 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.