Laserfiche WebLink
6.1.D. - Page 2 <br /> include design considerations as part of the criteria; instead, issues such as building <br /> height and design may be addressed during the entitlement process. The <br /> recommended criteria for evaluating the 7 proposals is attached for City Council <br /> consideration. <br /> The next steps of the Evaluation Committee will be to meet in January 2016 to begin the <br /> evaluation of the proposals based on the approved criteria and to determine dates to <br /> return to Council with recommendations for the proposal selection process. The <br /> Committee expressed their strong desire to move forward with the evaluation process <br /> on an accelerated timeline in order to meet State affordable housing funding deadlines. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> The Council could modify the evaluation criteria created by the Evaluation Committee. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> None. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> This activity is not a project under CEQA as defined in CEQA guidelines, section 15378, <br /> because it has no potential for resulting in either a direct foreseeable physical change in <br /> the environment. <br /> • / 1 <br /> RHONDA COFFMAN <br /> CDBG/HOME ADMINISTRATOR <br /> AARON AKNIN <br /> ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR <br /> r 1 <br /> (1 tL ' mn ri k <br /> MELISSA STEVENSON DIAZ <br /> CITY MANAGER <br /> ATTACHMENT <br /> 1. Draft Bradford Proposal Evaluation Criteria <br />