My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-01-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-01-11 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/22/2016 7:32:42 AM
Creation date
1/7/2016 3:28:05 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
1/11/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
355
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
6.1.D. - Page 3 RADFORD HOUSING EVALUATION CRITERIA <br /> EVALUATION CRITERIA POINTS RATING <br /> (Max Points) <br /> 1 Developer ability to meet proposed conceptual development 10 <br /> schedule. (Consider proposed fund sources, access to <br /> funds, timing and experience) <br /> 2 Developer history of meeting proposed development 10 <br /> schedules/milestones. <br /> 3 Team experience working together to successfully develop 15 <br /> similar affordable, mixed-use projects. This includes <br /> developer, builder/contractor, management, child care <br /> operator and other partners. (Consider partnership <br /> experience, type of projects, and date of projects) <br /> 4 Evidence of prior successful experience managing high 15 <br /> quality mixed-use projects. (Consider long term <br /> management, the developer, the partner proposed or both) <br /> 5 Demonstrated successful community outreach experience. 10 <br /> (Approach to outreach including prior experience) <br /> 6 Evidence of and commitment to Green Building 5 <br /> fundamentals and integration into the project design and <br /> construction. (Consider level of LEED proposed, <br /> experience) <br /> 7 Subsidy per unit and per bedroom, based on City land value 10 <br /> and development pro forma. (Consider cost per unit/per <br /> bedroom) <br /> • <br /> 8 How well does the proposal and amenities address the City 20 <br /> present day and original vision, values, priorities and needs <br /> for this site? <br /> • Affordable housing <br /> • Public open space at creek <br /> • Childcare/daycare space <br /> • Nonprofit space <br /> • Special needs housing (level of services) <br /> • Other amenities (e.g. car share, community rooms) <br /> 9 Parking — How compatible is it with the proposed use? 5 <br /> TOTAL POINTS (MAXIMUM POINTS = 100) 100 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.