Agmt16 CDM Smith Inc. - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

The first step in this task will be to formulate the alternatives to be considered for the streetcar and for an urban circulator bus concept. The Consultant will also discuss with the City the extent to which other options should be considered and how we should include possible future expansion options consistent with those shown in the General Plan. It is envisioned that the urban circulator option would be a bus based service. However, it could use low-floor tram-like buses that would give it many of the attributes of a streetcar. There may also be route variations that could be considered. For example, a bus service could cross the Caltrain tracks and serve the western portion of Broadway as depicted in the General Plan . The Consultant will develop a range of potential feasible alternatives for each of the following project features: • Modal Options — Assess viability of modern or heritage streetcar against other potential modes, including bus rapid transit, light rail transit, and urban circulator bus. • Alignment Options — Examine termini station locations at Sequoia Caltrain Station and future Stanford in Redwood City development, potential alternative alignments to constrained sections of Broadway Street, and turn-around loop options. • In-Street Operations — Assess center-running versus curbside running and the following streetcar options: mixed-flow trolley; enhanced trolley with transit priority consideration; and enhanced trolley in dedicated transit lanes. • Stations and Connectivity — identify and assess station spacing and locations, connectivity to future streetcar service expansion and intermodal transfer opportunities, and station size requirements. • Storage and Maintenance — Identify potential storage and maintenance facility locations based on design requirements. • ITS and Design Features — Incorporate transit signal priority, complete and green streets features, appropriate parking, and consistency with design criteria in completed and approved plans. The alternatives evaluation will include two steps or iterations: Step 1 - conceptual options screening; and Step 2 - detailed alternatives evaluation. Step 1 will include a qualitative conceptual-level evaluation designed to assess the advantages and disadvantages of the various options identified above. In Step 2, the Consultant will develop evaluation criteria to eliminate those options that do not meet project goals, do not have City or public support, or have fatal flaws, such as extensive right-of-way needs or significant environmental or transportation impacts. A short list of up to three fully-defined alternatives will be developed from the Step 1 evaluation to advance to the more quantitative analysis in Step 2. In Step 2, the Consultant will evaluate ridership (outputs from Tasks 1 .2 and 1 .6), operational issues, right-of-way/easement requirements, compatibility with adopted plans (see Task 1 .2, Redwood City General Plan, Downtown Precise Plan, Broadway Corridor Plan , and Stanford in Redwood City Precise Plan), feeder transit service interconnectivity, parking impacts, environmental factors, construction and operating costs, and other issues. The technical evaluation, financial analysis, and input of the public and key stakeholders will be used to prioritize the alternatives and recommend which of the alternatives should be considered as a Preferred Alternative (see Task 1 .8). ATTY/AGR.2016.053/GDM Smith