Laserfiche WebLink
City of Redwood City, Public Works Division Initial Study & Mitigated Negative Declaration <br />Document Date: October 15, 2015 <br />Revision Date: January 25, 2016 Page 42 Blankinship & Associates, Inc. <br /> <br />herbicide Material Safety Data Sheet (MSDS) (an example is provided in Appendix D), <br />and the DPR Worker Health and Safety Branch Pesticide Safety Information Series <br />(PSIS). The PSIS and the MSDS have specific information that describes precautions to <br />be taken during the use of the aquatic herbicide. <br /> <br />4. The condition of the portion of the Lagoon being treated is field-evaluated to ensure that <br />the application is necessary, feasible and can be conducted safely and according to <br />label. This evaluation considers target weed species, level of infestation, water and flow <br />conditions, alternate control methods, and amount of aquatic herbicide to be applied. <br /> <br />5. Prior to an application, the water operator will confirm no water is being pumped out of <br />the portion of the Lagoon being treated. <br /> <br />6. The location(s) at which the aquatic herbicide is introduced into the lagoon is <br />continuously staffed until the application is complete. Staff who are performing lagoon <br />inspection are in continuous cell phone or radio contact with staff making applications. In <br />the event that lagoon pumps are turned on while the application is being made, the <br />addition of aquatic herbicide will stop if it is deemed that the herbicide-treated water may <br />be pumped out of the lagoon. Not until the pump is turned off does aquatic herbicide <br />application resume. <br /> <br />Overview of Aquatic Herbicide Use <br /> <br />Depending on weed presence, aquatic herbicides containing copper may be applied as <br />necessary at different locations between the months of April and November. Some years, <br />no copper-containing aquatic herbicides will be applied. <br /> <br />Item a): Potentially Significant Unless Mitigation Incorporated. As presented in Section 1.2, <br />the City intends to obtain coverage under the 2013 General Permit that requires compliance <br />with the SIP and the CTR. The City is also requesting an exception under Section 5.3 of the <br />SIP to allow short-term or seasonal applications of aquatic herbicides that contain copper. <br /> <br />Copper Discussion <br /> <br />Within the San Francisco Bay, copper has been a pollutant of concern since the late 1980s <br />(CEP, 2004). In 1989, the lower South San Francisco Bay was declared impaired by copper, <br />leading businesses and government agencies to invest significantly in the identification of <br />copper sources and control measures. As a result of these activities, a wealth of information <br />has been produced on copper releases to surface waters. <br /> <br />Identified sources of copper in San Francisco Bay surface waters are numerous and include <br />vehicle brake pads, architectural copper, copper pesticides, industrial copper use, copper air <br />emissions, soil erosion, copper in domestic water discharged to storm drains, vehicle fluid <br />leaks and dumping, marine antifouling coatings, and copper algaecides applied directly to <br />surface waters. Among these sources, vehicle brake pads have been identified as the <br />predominant contributor representing around 42% of all copper loading (point and non-point <br />sources) to the Bay (CEP, 2004). Other significant sources and their contributions are <br />wastewater treatment plants at 28% and other non-point sources such as natural erosion <br />and reservoir spills at 19% of total load to the Bay. Copper applied as a pesticide to surface <br />waters represents an even smaller fraction of the total load to the Bay. A significant factor in <br />6.3.A. - Page 50