Laserfiche WebLink
<br />there were two bids to be considered separately only one of which can be the responsible <br />bid. How big a spread was there necessary to be before there were two lowest responsible <br />bids is up to the Council to determine. If both were close enough to be considered as two <br />lowest bids then the Charter required awarding the contact to the bidder with the higher <br />paid circulation. However, if the Council determined there was one lowest apparent bid, <br />the Council must determine if that bid meets the criteria, aside from cost, to be determined <br />as the lowest responsible bidder. To make that determination the Council would go to <br />those items set forth in the Code Section 2.69. If the Council determined there were two <br />lowest bids, then the contract must be awarded to the bidder with the highest paid <br />circulation, the Redwood City Almanac. The Council must look at the Almanac's bid to <br />see if it meets the criteria to be a responsible bidder. If the Almanac's bid did not meet <br />those criteria, then the Council could exercise its discretion and award it to the next higher <br />bidder. <br />Councilwoman Steinfeld stated that two years ago when designating the official <br />newspaper, the Council had to look at the word responsible and it was clear at that time <br />that the Times Tribune was in financial difficulty, and although they had a lower bid and a <br />greater paid circulation, the Council made an exception due to the word responsible. <br />Councilwoman Steinfeld stated that both the Almanac and the Tribune are fine newspapers <br />and equally responsible, but it comes back to a dollar is a dollar. <br />Councilwoman La Berge asked if the objectivity of a newspaper should playa role in the <br />selection process. <br />City Attorney Schricker said the Council would look at Section 2.69 (b) as to how those <br />aspects might reflect upon the image of the City in selecting an official newspaper. The <br />question arises if there is a particular aspect about the newspapers involved that would <br />detract from the efficiency of that newspaper to act as the media for official <br />announcements. <br />Councilwoman Howard expressed her concern regarding the situation where the owner <br />of the Almanac ran for City Council last year and in so doing he was permitted to present <br />his platform through that paper. Councilwoman Howard asked the City Attorney, if the <br />owner of the paper decides to run for Council this year would that be perceived by the <br />public that the Council is endorsing his candidacy? Councilwoman Howard stated that <br />this was a very difficult decision to make, and the people in the community expressed to <br />her that by giving a contract to the Almanac, they perceived it as an endorsement of the <br />official Redwood City newspaper. <br />City Attorney Schricker advised that there are a couple of issues which arise that could <br />be problematical with respect to the candidacy of a publisher of a newspaper if at the same <br />time the paper serves as the official newspaper ofthe City. The Council is entitled to <br />consider and exercise discretion as to whether or not there is sufficient identity with the <br />publisher of the newspaper and the official status of the newspaper as to confuse the voters <br />or give some implied consent or endorsement to that candidacy. That might be a concern <br /> Regular Meeting Minutes MINUTE BOOK NO. 52 <br /> December 19, 1994 Page No. 473 <br /> Page 10 <br /> .. """"-' ._--._._.~---------------_._,-_._,~-- <br />