Reso PC16-05 0027 PC Reso 2075 Broadway

Browse Search

without limitation the Mitigation, Monitoring and Reporting Plan attached to Resolution No. 15086 adopted on January 24, 2011); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determined that the proposed Downtown Planned Community Permit including three guideline deviations, and the Parking In-Lieu Fee would further the purposes of and appropriately implement the City of Redwood City General Plan and the Downtown Precise Plan. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AS FOLLOWS: Section1. The Planning Commission, having independently heard, considered and weighed all the evidence in the record, including evidence presented by City staff, the Applicant, the Appellant and members of the public, and being fully informed of the Project, the Zoning Administrator's decision, and the appeal, finds that the Appellant has not shown, based on evidence in the record, that the Zoning Administrator's decision was made in error, that there was an abuse of discretion by the Zoning Administrator, that the Zoning Administrator's decision was otherwise improper, or that the City's notices, agendas, and appeal procedures were unlawful in any manner, and, in the exercise of its independent judgment, hereby denies the appeal and approves the Downtown Planned Community Permit including three guideline deviations, and the Parking In-Lieu Fee based on the following findings and subject to the Conditions of Approval set forth below. This determination is based on the entire record, including without limitation the application materials, the DTPP, 2011 DTPP EIR, the entire record of the administrative proceedings regarding the adoption of the DTPP, the staff reports and attachments prepared for the Zoning Administrator hearing on the Project and the appeal, each of which is incorporated herein by reference and which serve as an adequate and appropriate evidentiary basis for the findings and actions set forth in this Resolution. Section 2. Initial Study Checklist (IS): In the exercise of its independent judgment, the Planning Commission finds that: a. The IS was prepared in accordance with all legal requirements. b. The Planning Commission has reviewed and analyzed the IS and other information in the entire record (including the updated traffic analyses referenced above) and has considered the information contained therein, including the written and oral comments received at the public hearing on the Project, prior to acting upon or approving the Project. c. Based on substantial evidence in the record, the proposed Project ATTY/RES0.0027/PC RESO 2075 BROADWAY REV:04-1846 VR Page 3 of 28