Laserfiche WebLink
6.3.C. - Page 2 <br /> ANALYSIS <br /> When the agreement was initially executed in 2003, it made approximately 797 parking <br /> spaces available to the City to operate on weekends beginning every Friday at 4:00 p.m. <br /> and ending each Monday at 2:00 a.m. Additionally, the County made the parking spaces <br /> available an additional 50 weeknights per year from 6:30 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. of the following <br /> day. The City and County then updated the agreement in 2007 expanding the City hours <br /> of operation increasing City hours of operation to every weeknight instead of just 50 <br /> weeknights under the terms of the original agreement. The County's parking structure <br /> and lot helps City meet the needs of residents, workers, and visitors to the downtown <br /> area by making use of the County's existing public infrastructure. <br /> ALTERNATIVES <br /> The Council could elect to not approve the amendment to the Agreement, <br /> which will significantly reduce the City's stock of nighttime and weekend parking spaces <br /> in the downtown area by removing 797 parking spaces from the City's parking supply. <br /> Alternatively, the City could consider constructing a parking structure which is currently <br /> estimated to cost in excess of $25,000 per space, which would cost in total at least <br /> $19,925,000 to replace all 797 parking spaces. <br /> FISCAL IMPACT <br /> The total cost of the recommended 15 year agreement with the County amounts to <br /> $1,297,500. This amount is favorable in comparison to the approximate $19,925,000 it <br /> would cost at a minimum to build a similar amount of parking spaces. However, it is <br /> important to note that the latter could be available to the public at all times, while this <br /> agreement only allows for weeknight and weekend parking. <br /> For the first year of the agreement, the initial $86,500 cost of the fee could be funded <br /> by the Parking District Fund. In subsequent years, funding the use of the parking <br /> structure and parking lot may require contributions from both the Parking District Fund <br /> and the General Fund. The General Fund contribution would depend on the amount of <br /> revenue brought in to the Parking District Fund and the Parking District Fund's existing <br /> operating and capital expenditure commitments. <br /> ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW <br /> Approving by motion the agreement and appropriating funds to pay the fee for the <br /> public use of the County of San Mateo's parking garage and parking lot is not a <br /> "project" subject to the California Environmental Quality Act because the motion does <br /> not involve commitment to any specific project which may result in a potentially <br /> significant physical impact on the environment (California Code of Regulations Title 14, <br /> Chapter 3, Section 15378(b)(4)). <br />