My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2016-06-27 Closed and Joint SA PFA
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2010-2019
>
2016
>
AgdaPkt 2016-06-27 Closed and Joint SA PFA
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/27/2016 10:47:54 AM
Creation date
6/23/2016 4:49:31 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Meeting Type
Joint
Agency Type
City Council and Successor Agency and Public Financing Authority
Date
6/27/2016
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
689
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Water Utility Finances & Rates 34 <br /> Water & Sewer Financial Plans & Rate Studies <br />use often reflect high levels of non‐essential outdoor water consumption, such as for large <br />yards and/or lack of water‐wise landscaping, and/or very inefficient use of water. The City <br />attributes most of the water used in this highest tier toward contributing to the need for the <br />City’s recycled water system and Water Resources Management Program. <br /> <br />B) Transition to Uniform Quantity Charge for Non‐Residential Accounts <br />BWA recommends the City implement a commercial volumetric rate with a uniform rate that <br />applies to each unit of water use, in order to more equitably recover costs from non‐residential <br />accounts. The City’s current rate structure includes a 2‐tiered inclining rate structure for <br />commercial water use (excluding irrigation accounts) with the first 15 units of monthly water <br />use billed at the lower tier rate and all additional water use billed at the higher rate. The impact <br />of this structure is that smaller commercial customers obtain most of their water at substantially <br />lower rates than larger commercial or institutional customers. <br /> <br />Unlike residential customers, which are a relative homogenous class, commercial customers <br />include an extremely wide range of accounts from small offices and stores to restaurants to <br />large office buildings, hospitals, and schools, etc. These commercial accounts have widely <br />different consumption patterns. Hence it is impracticable to develop a system of rate tiers that <br />equitably apply to such a wide range of commercial accounts. With residential rates, higher tier <br />rates generally apply to discretionary outdoor water use. However, with tiered commercial <br />rates, higher tiers simply result in higher charges on customers with higher levels of water <br />demand, regardless of how efficient the customers are with water use. <br /> <br />For example, under the City’s current rates, a small commercial account that uses water very <br />inefficiently would still pay $4.82 per hcf, while a large customer or school that has invested <br />heavily in water efficiency would pay $7.87 for most of their water use simply because they are <br />a larger customer with higher water demand. <br /> <br /> <br />6.4.A. - Page 61
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.