My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1956
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1956
>
CC MIN 1956
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/25/2017 1:34:09 PM
Creation date
7/25/2016 10:19:35 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/3/1956
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
339
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
149 <br />subdivision fees. The Council must take into account property which has been in Redwood City for many <br />years. He suggested taking property as far back as 1950 which is still vacant and when the owner applies <br />fora building permit, he should be charged the subdivision fee. The present population in Redwood City is <br />making it necessary to do something about the Sewage Disposal Plant and extensions must be done, this yearp <br />A bond issue might be needed to reconvert and add to the Sewage Plant. The probhbly can meet the exp: <br />rpm on this plant by raising the fee for use of the sewers. The present rate is 60(,,. If a bond issue is Vip A, <br />rwued, <br />it might raise the tax rate as much as 50. If consideration is not given now, tax rate will necessarily.- <br />have to be increased. By applying the annexation and subdivision fee much of the cost to the present tax <br />payers would be eliminated* He was of the opinion that consideration should be given to annexation and <br />subdivision fees retroactive to 1950. Mayor Royer announced that this would be taken up at a study meeting* <br />COUNCILMAN -JZIS3 REPORT REGARDING POLICY CONCEERNING AGENDAS., INTRODUCTION OF NIM7 1,1ATERIAL AT COUNCIL Tf7,ETINGS,, <br />ETC. Councilman Vieiss read the following report. - <br />Establishment of policy or rule requiring more complete information to be submitted to council <br />on questions or problems for consideration or determination by the council. <br />With the agenda for council meeting of April 30, each councilman received a note reading <br />as follows: "Should you wish to have an item placed on the agenda., please forward memo to the <br />City Clerk, Deadline is 12:00 P.li. Friday." <br />Personally I welcome the ideal because it is the yeast that can and should lead to the <br />establishment of a policy or rule that will guide councilmen and others in their desire to <br />have matters included on the agenda for careful consideration by the council in regular meeting. <br />I must admit however that I am not quite clear as to the complete intent - Is it intended as <br />a principle that councilmen shall not hereafter offer ne,,,,,r material at Council meetings: Is it <br />further intended that all proposals shall be submitted in writing? The forms attached to the <br />aforer.ientioned note are addressed to the city manager, is it intended that the city manager will <br />explore and analyze such proposals and submit necessary factual data bearing on the question together <br />with his conclusions and recommendations? <br />I am whole heartedly in accord with the general idea and -sincerely advocate any proposal that <br />will assist us in tMnsacting the public business in a more orderly, progressive and informed <br />OWN manner* <br />%W" Accordingly may I suggest that the Mayors proposal be ex,)lored and expanded so that there <br />may be drawn up a policy or rule that shall guide everyone concerned. There is no question that <br />it would be good business to submit all matters in a manner that vrould permit the city manager, <br />as our advisor and administrative officer to gather the necessary data which will permit us to <br />act intelligently on any and all questions. It further believe that any question or problem, <br />except those of an emergency naturej brought to the floor by any one in any manner at a stated <br />meeting should always be referred either to a committee, commission or the -city manager as the <br />case may warrant, before some is considered or acted upon by the council. <br />Naturally it follows that under such a procedure we would have a complete and comprehensive <br />report prepared by a given time as indicated by the mayor or the council. Such report., which by the <br />way should accompany every submission to the council no matter fromwhatsource., should be <br />complete and be made available to each councilman (by furnishing a copy) at hast three days <br />before the date it is to appear on the agenda. <br />The report above referred to should contain in substance and summary at least the following: <br />a* Source3 individual, committee or agency of origin. <br />b. The import and scope of the question or problem. <br />C* Factual data., information, etc, bearing on the question or <br />problem, cost estimates (rough) wherever applicable possible <br />alternates3 etc. <br />soma d. Summary of findings and conclusions. <br />e* Their recommendations. <br />fe City managers comments and recommendations where the matter was <br />originated by some source or agency other than his office. <br />In pursuance of the foregoing it is my recommendation that the city attorney be requested to formulate <br />and submit three weeks hence a prepared statement that shall incorporate in substance the foregoing <br />ideas for adoption as a plicy or rule for the guidance of the council and all other city officials, <br />boards, commissions., committees, etc. <br />Idayor Royer again explained why he was adking the Council to try his policy for one month in regard to <br />giving the Clerk items for the agenda. If his system does not prove itself., then they can change it and <br />try something else. He asked that they at least give it a try for one month. Councilman Herkner suggested <br />that Councilman 'Jeissls report be studied at the same time Councilman Stout's report of annexation is <br />considered. This was agreed upon by the Council. <br />CITY ENGINEER REGARDING REZONING TO C -1-H CANYON ROAD AND OAK KNOLL TIRIVE. 2revious approvals of rezoning and <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.