|
x/91
<br />We then fere ask your cnns _rICc r tj.c-i of rn�r rer,uest to extend the ti::le of o^cunany of the
<br />Ross Caraoa and n,djoining property, as outlined in the City Attorney's letter of May !1,
<br />1956, from June 15, 1956 to August 15, 1956.
<br />"Pete" Towne asked thgt- the dates in this letter be changed to read from July 15, 1956 to August 6, 1956.
<br />Oscar Holmes agreed to the extension provided he will be �_riven an extension of 1.5 working days on the contract,
<br />and that the Council will back him up if the building is not ready to start wrecking on August 6th. City
<br />Attorney Currie stated that this should be considered as two different items. Oscar Holmes stated that
<br />it
<br />_August 6th should be the latest date bscause of the tLap element concerning the stormy season. Council -man
<br />Bri tschgi moved that Towne Motor CoQpa.ny be given an extension to Au;-ust 6th and Oscar Holmes be niven an
<br />extension of 15 rrorking days to compensate for the loss of tine an(! the City to back up T?r. 7ol-nes. City
<br />Engineer Jain stated that the City will ba obligated to pay the additional three weeks t-itme for inspection
<br />Flo
<br />costs. Councilman Weiss made an amendment to the motion that Mr. Towne reimburse the City for any inspection
<br />costs due to this delay. Councilman Granger questioned the cost of inspectors during the delay and the cost
<br />during the three week extension. Councilman Stout stated that there is an extra cost and he thought that
<br />possible P,,Zr. Towne could pay a porvion of t}ae inspectors fee and therefore Councilman S+..out seconded the
<br />motion. Councilman Spillers stated that, the few property owners have been mitacted_and they did not object
<br />to the delay so he was of the opinion that the City sr.ou.ld pay the additional, cost. Towne stated t i'It
<br />he would talk with the Council on this matter, however, he did not like the idea of having to nay an add-
<br />i ti onal $400. The amendment lost on roll call with Councilmen Britschgi, Granger, Spillers and P.Ravor Royer
<br />voing No and Councilman Herkner being noted absent.
<br />The lla:,�cr called for a roll call rote oil the oriFinal. motion. Crnzncilman Granger stated that he thous7ht
<br />that there was some other approach that could be made in this situation and he did nn+, vo+,e NO just to favor
<br />1Y11r. Towne. Councilman Weiss spoke in r%ar. d to the City having to pay additional funds and he was of the
<br />P" opinion that this siioul.d be taken into consideration. This was followed by discussion. The original motion
<br />Y
<br />rrn carried on roll call with Councilman Herkner being noted absent.
<br />Mr. Towne thanked P�I.r. Hohmes for his consideration, in this matter and the Mvaor toldrtr. �'ol.mes that the
<br />Coi%icil was pleased with the progress of his wor?r on the park.inP Tot,
<br />PER.a^NPI., UP' PRA1C, R. G. uDm RrG?,D?N xrF?TRCTY_n?;. int stnted tate want
<br />ad permis-
<br />rtR�LP 7,�kF 77ATr17,Tr,4r. �
<br />sion to move the water meter from the present loc?tion to his adjoining property. Ne said he his a nrospec-
<br />+,j.ve purchaser for this property. The water meter ser,,ri.ces 1!152 Jefferson Avenue and he tftrants to transfer
<br />this meter to 4160 Jefferson. Councilman Spillers stated th-.t, Mr. i:unt had asked for water service because
<br />his well went dry-. Tor. Hunt stated th-.t the old home can be serviced her the well. Councilman. Spillers
<br />stated that he well not agroe to transfer this water service nrm, and then hayt.; Mr. bunt come back .and tell the
<br />Colulcil that his well ha:, gone dry and he warts a new. connection.
<br />T7ater Supe.rir�tendert i. L. VI ntPr stated that as far as the mater Department is concerned they wo-:ld not
<br />object to t -,-is conn, ction, how,.ver. the City siictild protect themselve., against possi*hle dnmavc
<br />POW
<br />if + c> allow this meter to r� :uClJgli, le?1 i. Ii %r. illPitt :' '10-1e t0 be ser-JiCed by Well water only.
<br />Councilman Hritschgi mcrred that this -rater -meter be. transferee fi o a 1;1 2 to 111601 Jefferson 1, renue s,lh jAct,
<br />to the coIldi.ticn stated 'by the Water Sunerintendent. C(-Lainil.man Granc";r S'::?ted th-', he Was_ ref +he n1;1n;iwi
<br />t1r;i; thio property ?Fall he sold +,,o apo+her propF'rt,T rsrrnPr• '"hys Shry17l.ra be handled by the nom,.. rn Pr, RRH•
<br />roa TAry A r: -1 c Ha r Currie '- i n 1 Trial - P. r r.
<br />..a..l._r, a„h�r than Pyr. ..��it. City . tto_ney .,urri., stated that i„ cjiu n.t m^x,� an;, di.£lArenne wrc the
<br />600 pr jjerty owner .,tris because the meter will. he for the property and the owner. The conditions are
<br />(1.) that the7T can not sercie lliK2 Jeffers^li .tive n.ue fror., the "'a.tPr meter after it i s moved to 1 1.!0 Je.ffPrcr?Il
<br />Avon;:-, and (2) an a-reement he nada by ?:?r. 11diit, givin? the ''ty parr ssion to '.,i:e t} -_c away .fro,i `.:im
<br />S^ ti:"? t +tilc %a_ vy "^rill n0 be li'11` i pOils CJlO• Ci0-IY1C3LI13n Rr1 tS^ham i asked ? ^ ? T1rd his s:lOtibll ^SO thz4tu
<br />thf" Cuiuicii .S ould Stag&:,s : that lkr. l'i'le �'Ji..P. !'Z -,re the 'O-ltl('=il 1.1'1 rerSOII aSk111� f^Y' c?;q?7�c 7.11 rF'lU("?t—
<br />i ii- the w=)ter mp Lur . r7 Jnr th S tle- tl-e 4 -he -)Sr 1 T cm f? j , t } a r �
<br />'.:y _ - �', i ._ _t v+:-a".iCil.. cc�ul'3 rl.i;; .- , ,. Qerty �..az r � tliu ?� can t
<br />
|