Laserfiche WebLink
drawn to buld 31 two-story units, <br />When Mr. Stuart's plans were completed he proceeded to seek financing, and he told Mr. <br />Irwin on several occasions that he was unable to obtain financing until streets, curbs, <br />sidewalks acid storm drains were installed, but that Mr. Irwin should not mention that <br />fact to any of the neighbors. <br />Mr. Stuart has 110 fto frontage on Union Avenue. He will not pay one cent more for streets, <br />curbs, storm drains, etc. for 31 units than the other residents will have to pay for single <br />and duplex residences. Several residents have even more property and larger frontages <br />for a single duelling unit. <br />" <br />The Planning Commission refused rezoning to R-3 for 18 one-story units on the recommendation <br />3 <br />..r� <br />of the City Engineer. You, the City Council, rezoned to R-3 for 18 me -story units. <br />We realized at the time that these large lots could be used for more than a single duplex, <br />therefore, there was no protest to 18 one-story units, and if Mr. Stuart had kept faith <br />and not deceived the residents he would not have incurred any additional expense. His 18 <br />one-story units could have been nearly completed.by.this time. <br />The City Council by.restoring this property to its original R-•2 zoning would be correcting <br />and injustice that was done under circumstances based more or less on misrepresentation of <br />.wry <br />facts. <br />The statements made by some that such action, on the part of the Council would deny the <br />people the protection of the zoning laws is incorrect. On the contrary, the rectification <br />of a previous error would serve to strengthen the faith of the people as a whole. <br />'ge feel sure that with the above facts, justice will prevail. <br />Very truly yours, <br />(ten signatures) <br />Mayor Royer stated that he had been contacted by on of the property owners in the area and had been <br />told that they would not object to an 18 unit apartment. He further stated that he had contacted <br />Mr. Stuart's attorney and told him of the conversation. Mr. Dell 'Ergo stated that they could not <br />get the necessary financing to take care of the necessary overhead for an 18 unit apartment. Mr. Carl <br />Wood, 445 Redwood Avenue, spoke in favor of leaving the property in R-3 zone. Mrs. Roberts, 1630 <br />Union Avenue, Mrs. Lucille Haney, corner Union and Woodside Road, both spoke at some length against the WOR <br />31 units and stated their reasons for doing so. Councilman Spillers stated that this was an injustice 0WW <br />and he could not see wiry the Council was going to adopt a resolution of intention stating the Council's <br />intention because this has been back and forth between the Council and the Plannia# Commission and <br />he could not see why this had to be done. Why not just vote on whether they will rezone or not. City <br />Attorney Currie stated that this was the quickest method and this is the one legal way to proceed <br />with this problem because of the tie vote. This was followed by discussion by Mr. Dell'Ergo, Council, - <br />men Granger, Weiss, Stout and Herkner. Councilman Herkner amended the motion so that if the motion <br />prevails that the Council would look in favor of the 18 units. City Attorney Currie was of the opinion <br />that this would have to be a separate motion. The original motion carried on roll call with Council- <br />man Spillers and Mayor Royer voting N0. <br />The Mayor announced that this will be referred back to the Planning Commission. Councilman Herkner <br />moved that this Council looks with favor to the building of 18 units on this property, seconded by <br />Councilman Spillers. City Attorney Currie stated that this will coxae back to the Council and that <br />this motion was expression of opinion of the Council. Councilman Herkner included in the motion to keep <br />this building at a 30' setback as the other homes in the block. This was followed by discussion in <br />regard to one story units. Councilman Weiss offered a substitute motion that the Council will look <br />with favor upon a proper development of the land if suitable plans are submitted and a application for <br />rezoning is submitted. This substitution. lost for lack of a second. The original motion carried ,. <br />on roll call* <br />Mr. Stuart asked when this would come up before the Planning Commission. The Mayor stated that this <br />will probably be the first meeting of next month. This was followed by discussion in regard to what <br />1, <br />action Mr. Stuart could take. <br />The Mayor declared a recess at 10:20 F. M. Councilman Spillers left the meeting at this time. <br />._ '.+«WPfUrMllMllnul,l'I11 - ni,ir �i� r ��W, q !,!: 7.- I Tt. li <br />