Laserfiche WebLink
ppe1 <br />STREETS and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Britschgi and carried on roll call, Councilman <br />Spillers being noted absent. <br />COMETTEE REPORT ON BAY AREA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT. Councilman Granger moved to accept the report, the report <br />to be made a part of the minutes, and to be referred for a study meeting, seconded -by Councilman Weiss. <br />Councilman Stout stated that he had s_)me comments he wanted to submit in regard to this subject. The Mayor <br />asked that he turn in his comments for a study meeting. The motion carried. <br />Gentlemen: <br />In accordance with Council instruction of Monday, December 3, 1956, your Committee <br />on the proposed Bay Area Rapid Tiransit District met Tuesday, December 4th, and, together <br />with the City Attorney, reviewed the proposed legislation entitled "SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA <br />RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT ACT". <br />The following recommendations for amendment of the draft legislation are presented <br />for your consideration: <br />1. Creation of the District should be made the subject of an election <br />throughout the area situate within the boundaries of the District. <br />2. The stated purpose of the District should be "public transportation" <br />and reference to the creation thereof for "municipal purposes" should be <br />deleted. <br />9. Provision should be made for the establishment of zones of benefit <br />within the proposed District, among which taxes may be levied at diff- <br />erent rates according to the distances between the transit facilities <br />proposed, and/or.constructed, and the representative zones. <br />10. The District's power to lease or contract for the use of its rapid <br />transit facilities to any other operator should be limited by requiring <br />any such lease to contain a provision r6taining in the District Bbard the <br />power to fax rates and fares for the use of the facilities. <br />In addition to the amendments listed above, the Committee recommends that this <br />Council urge the Senate Interim Committee on Rapid Transit to make every effort to obtain <br />funds for the establishment of the District from the Federal Government and from the <br />present Bridge Authorities in the Bay Area. <br />The City Attorney has been requested to prepare a draft resoluti-on embodying the <br />substance of the above recommendations for you consideration. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Louis Weiss, Chairman <br />E. A. Rolison, Member <br />R. J. Costello, City Attorney <br />WEED ABATEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. The Committee recommends the cancellation of the following charges: <br />Arb. talk X12 -E Lot 5 <br />3. The number of directors of the District and the manner of their <br />4.75 <br />appointment should be changed to provide the same representation and manner <br />4 <br />of appointment throughout the area to comprise said District as provided in <br />10.25 <br />the Bay Area Air Pollution Control District Act. <br />Arb. Blk. 470 Lot 4 <br />49 Power to affix the facsimile signature of the Treasurer and/or <br />4.75 <br />General Manager to any check or draft of the District should be limited to <br />Arb. Blk 913 Lot 9-A <br />the Treasurer and the General Manager, or a deputy appointed by and direct- <br />15.50 <br />ly responsible to, the Treasurer and the General Manager, respectively. <br />10-A <br />5. The proposed bonded debt limitation in the amount of 25% of the <br />16.30 <br />assessed valuation of the taxable property within the District should be <br />reduced to 15% and be made specifically applicable to debt secured by <br />general obligation bonds only. <br />6. The power to issue general obligation bonds should be conditioned <br />upon approval thereof by a two-thirds majority of the votes cast at an <br />election on the question of incurring the indebtedness. <br />7. The District should be enlarged to include all member counties in <br />their entirety, and specifically Santa Clara County should be included in <br />its entirety. <br />8. The power of the District to levy and collect ad valorum taxes should <br />bb specifically limited by providing a maximum annual tax rate inclusive <br />of bond redemption and interest. In this regard the County of San Mateo <br />has suggested a maximum annual tax rate, inclusive of bond redemption a nd <br />interest, of 25® per $100o assessed valuation. <br />9. Provision should be made for the establishment of zones of benefit <br />within the proposed District, among which taxes may be levied at diff- <br />erent rates according to the distances between the transit facilities <br />proposed, and/or.constructed, and the representative zones. <br />10. The District's power to lease or contract for the use of its rapid <br />transit facilities to any other operator should be limited by requiring <br />any such lease to contain a provision r6taining in the District Bbard the <br />power to fax rates and fares for the use of the facilities. <br />In addition to the amendments listed above, the Committee recommends that this <br />Council urge the Senate Interim Committee on Rapid Transit to make every effort to obtain <br />funds for the establishment of the District from the Federal Government and from the <br />present Bridge Authorities in the Bay Area. <br />The City Attorney has been requested to prepare a draft resoluti-on embodying the <br />substance of the above recommendations for you consideration. <br />Respectfully submitted, <br />Louis Weiss, Chairman <br />E. A. Rolison, Member <br />R. J. Costello, City Attorney <br />WEED ABATEMENT COMMITTEE REPORT. The Committee recommends the cancellation of the following charges: <br />Arb. talk X12 -E Lot 5 <br />A. S. Liguori <br />4.75 <br />spraying <br />4 <br />10.25 <br />disking <br />Arb. Blk. 470 Lot 4 <br />Julio & Francis Luciani <br />4.75 <br />spraying <br />Arb. Blk 913 Lot 9-A <br />P. A. & A. L. Bygdness & <br />15.50 <br />spraying <br />10-A <br />J. J. & S. J. Smith <br />16.30 <br />Spraying <br />