Laserfiche WebLink
R4 <br />Geo. L. Leonard Construction Company advised Mr. Grupp that they have several interested.buyers making <br />inquiry relative to purchasing this property. He advised his clients to withhold executing. any, further <br />Agreements of Sale until such time as the Council either condemns the property or abandons existing <br />plans. <br />There was considerable discussion as to whether or not the three phase signal at Whipple and E1 Camino <br />Real would or would not effect the plan lines. If the signals prove themselves there is a possibility <br />that the plan lines can be abandoned. Councilman Granger moved that this be checked into by next week ..r <br />in regard to the three phase signals so that the City can give an answer next week as to *hether or <br />not they are going to condemn or abandon the plans, seconded by Councilman Britschgi. Councilman <br />Granger added to his motion to have the proper authorities contact the State Engineers for all <br />necessary information regarding the signals and whether or not they think the signals will Work at NOR <br />this intersection. This was followed by discussion after which it was decided that if the signals can "A" <br />be installed that this would work as a substitute to buying the land in question. Motion carried. <br />CITY MANAGER REPORT ON BLEACHER COVERING AND LIGHTS FOR SOFTHALL`GROUNDS. Councilman Royer moved that this <br />be held -over to the next regular meeting, seconded by Councilman Stout and carried. <br />CITY MANAGER AND CITY ATTORNEY REPORT REGARDING LOT 89 BLOCK 132, RANGE D, MEZESVILLE (Howland Street). City <br />Attorney Currie reported that Lot 8 ownership is vested in the Racy heirs, and they have been the owners <br />since 1927, the taxes having been delinquent'all this time. The City has no possessory right whatsoiver <br />in this property. This was followed by discussion on how the City could secure title to the*property. <br />It'was,decided that the City did not want this property. Also under discussion was how this property <br />could be cleaned up. Councilman Royer moved that the City Attorney go ahead with the procedure of <br />contacting the County Health Department regarding the sanitary condition of this lots seconded by <br />Councilman Stout and carried* <br />Councilman Granger moved that the City take the authority to clean up the sidewalk at any time if it W" <br />proves necessary, seconded by Councilman Spillers and carried. <br />The Clerk reported that he was in RECEIPT OF $1,298.00 FROM THE MENLO FIRE DISTRICT FUNDS FOR FISCAL YEAR DUE <br />TO ANNEXATION OF WILLIAMS TERRITORY, HILLS KNOWLES TERRITORY AND MALEYCO TERRITORY. City Attorney <br />Currie stated that recovery of funds should be remembered when future annexation charges are under <br />consideration. <br />STATE RECREATION COWSSION REGARDING PROPOSED REAPPRAISAL OF RECREATION SERVICES. The following letter was <br />read by the Clerk: <br />The request of the City Council of Redwood City fora reappraisal of the recreation <br />services is of interest to us* The need for a reappraisal of plans for land acquisition <br />and facility development is apparent in view of the population increases cited in the <br />letter from R. S. Dodge, City Clerk, received January 26th. Thank you for your <br />generous comments on oar previous appraisal. <br />The Commission's policy on appraisals of established year-round recreation services has <br />changed since we rendered our appraisal in 1951. The limited number of formal studies <br />possible for us to conduct each years are now being confined to plans of development <br />in communities which do not have an established reereation commission, department and WNW <br />services. <br />However, we would like to suggest a new method of work and assistance to Redwood City. <br />Iit:April of this years the Commission will publish a "Guide for Planning Recreation - <br />Park Areas and Facilities". This publication is the resilt of a years' research <br />conducted by the California Committee on Planning for Recreation and Park Areas and <br />Facilities* This guide should be useful to both the Planning Commlissi6n and the <br />Recreation and Park Coomaission in Redwood City in establishing their own space standards <br />for recreation -park purposes. <br />We suggest that a series of meetings be held by one or,both of these commission, to <br />which a recreation specialist on our staff would be invited. A study of the guild <br />and application of its suggested standards to the land areas and pupulation needs of <br />Redwood City would be carried on jointly by your city officials, administrators of the <br />recreation department, the park department and our staff member* <br />Please advise us whether this method of assistance meets with you approval. <br />_ __._._.. __ _YAllilu1111eui-�IInym-•u;i il+iiliwk' _ I ___ .. _. <br />