Laserfiche WebLink
Q� <br /> ract. was made v�i�haut, deduc�i.on for any of +he item�� on acc�l:nt due the Cit�r frcm Thomas Company. The City <br /> Cotlec±or�s office biZled Thomas Company unti.� Au�;ust of 1_9�3. In Decemher� 1.9�3, the Cit,y �ngineer wrote <br /> the Thomas Company� copy to City Attorney� demanding pay�:sent. mY:is appears to have been the last effort at <br /> coll.ection i:hat was made. <br /> ' Final �cceptance of t,he work without dEduction for claims amo�.;nts ta a stipula�icn tt�a� the contract �ras <br /> ', performed ZIl accorcjance :vzth its terms as to all items of which we then had knc�rledge. Certainly trais <br /> ' would be inconsistent wit}� an action far a breach of contract. . <br /> ' ° �Tr.is heing a written contract, tY�e statute of lamita�;iuns did not run unti.I January� 1957. The st�atute of =; <br /> limitations ncsw ha�nng r�ir, the claim as pr�sently uncollectable� regar�less 4�' the merit:�. �r,� <br /> Or_. the bas�.s of the al�ove report, it is the recorrunenciation of th� City Attorney that al.� three claims be <br /> removed from the records of the City as legally enforceable. <br /> It is �also reconunended by the City� Attorney that in the event of damage to �ny Citg property caused by the <br /> act of a third party� an im�.ediate ��ritten report� eontaining complete inforr,iation of the reZevant facts� � <br /> ' �� <br /> bA made na later than tenchys after the occurrence, so that in the event that a valid c]aim in favor of the <br /> City is present� evidencc v�ill be availabl.e at the time l.egal ac+.,ion is founcl ta �e necessary to enforce <br /> the same. This office has es+�blished this procedure with the Police Department in connection �rith a� <br /> accident involving motor vehicles. The same reporting procedure sricnzld be fol.l.owed by all depart•r?�ents. <br /> Councilm�n �pillers maved appraval of the �ity Attorneyts recommendations� secor.ded by Coune�.].m,an VPeiss <br /> who asked that the maker of the motion include in the motion that the City Manager set up the necessary <br /> machinery ta see that this is compled wit}i. 'i�is was �ncludcd in the motion which earried. <br /> CITY AUDITQft REPORT ON PORTIOiJ OF I,OT 8� BLOCK 13� RANGE D� MEZESVILLE� adjoinin� Kemple praperty on Fiawland <br /> Avenue. The Clerk read the letter which reads in part as follavPS= <br /> ......... The County records shaw it as ha?ting been sold to the State for Delinquent �axes. <br /> C�ur records shax no taxes as having been paid since 1928. <br /> At the Council meeting of FeT�uary 27, 1956� there was a repart of the City Manager an�1. the then City At— �� <br /> torney� C. Currie� which reads as follows: �� <br /> City Attorney Currie reported that I,ot 8 ownership is vested in the 1�2acy heirs and they have been oomers <br /> since 1927� the taxes having been delinquent all this time. The City has no possessory right whatsoever <br /> �_n this property. <br /> ' I am also in receipt of a letter from the County T� Collector�s Office relative to some de linquent parceZs . <br /> wh�.ch the Ex�i.neer�s office expressed an interest in, and which th� County would li.ke to have c]�eared up. <br /> , Councilman Weiss asked if any of this property �ras involved in the proposed plan lines of Industrial Way <br /> extension. City Assessc�r Brop�,r said that it v�ras involved. Couneilman ti'Peiss moved that this be referred <br /> , to the City Manager to see what the proper gr�cedure is to obtain title� seconded by Councilman Spi11e rs <br /> and carried. <br /> Acting W.ayor Herkner reminded the Council of the letter from the County Tax Collector relative to the delin— <br /> quent parcels. It was the general opis�ion of the Council that t,he City A�ianager should c ansider this as a <br /> part of the motion that was just passed� and he was asked to check this list alsa. <br /> SIDF�PTALK COP:�TTEE REPOR�. The Clerk read the follonring report: <br /> The Council appointed Sidewalk Comrait;tee met �ctcber 2 to consider requests far� extension of time on side— <br /> vralk notices issued by the Cit,y Engineer�s office� and the committee wishes, to make the follo�vving recom— <br /> r,.endations: <br /> NOTICE NOTICE �IORK ONiNER'S NAl� � <br /> NU�I�IDER DATE ,LOCATI0P1 _ AT1U ADDRFSS COn�?MITTEE RECONIMENDATION <br /> 1t79 7/$/57 Ptn.Lot 1� Blk. C� �"ary Jakenovi.ch On�mer to repair sidewa�.k ad�acent <br /> Vera Avenue Villa.s 2 Clinton Caurt� R.C. � to lot. City to repa.ir driveway <br /> ad3acent to P.G.BcE.CO. easement� <br /> as ownership of easement and pri�- <br /> ' ate alley cannot be deterrna.ned� <br /> according to City Attorney and <br /> City Assessor. <br /> K1.6 ?/23/57 Lots ?,8�&9�Blk.11t� Sam Schil].aci� etal <br /> Range B� Mezesville 2031 Bre�nrster, R.C. F�:tension to Jan. 6� 1958 <br /> 551 8/9,57 Lot 12, Blk. Zl, Leatha H. Wi7.son <br /> Range D� I�ezesville 1526 Georgette Drive Extension to Dec. 2� 1957 <br /> San Jose <br /> - �.�.. ..�..t.w,��.,:,�.�:��.��.�,,. ,_..� . _ ,,,.,,�.. <br /> �,x.,����, - -�.... , _ ..rw._ ...�.,� . ��__ <br />