My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1957
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1957
>
CC MIN 1957
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2016 5:29:47 PM
Creation date
7/25/2016 1:11:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/7/1957
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
401 <br /> Additional Police & Fire Dept. Personnel (Recurring) $ 50,000 <br /> Parking Lot deficiencies (Possible over next four or five? 20,000 <br /> Yacht Harbor (Questionable to my mind - but commited)years 60,000 <br /> For a total of $3,130,000 <br /> Of course there are many otheritems of a similar nature too numerous to mention, <br /> and I here I wihs to note that some of the above items were included in our city managers <br /> statement as published in recent issure of the Tribune. Incidentally it must be borne <br /> in mind that future annexations will not in any sense lessen the seriousness of our <br /> financial situation, on the contrary it will definitely serve to aggravate it. <br /> It is such factors that I have weighed, and which have brought me to the conslusion <br /> that the sales and use tax is not only a necessity but a must if the small home owner, <br /> the backbone of the community, is not to be taxed out of his home, and yet enable us <br /> to privide the necessary funds for the continued operation on a sound financial basis in <br /> a progressive and orderly manner. <br /> It is because of such conclusions that I have decided to hold steadfast in the face <br /> rom of what to some may appear a preponderance of opposition.' Because the safeguards that <br /> I have urged and the equitable allocations as privided in the companion ordinance will <br /> ensure that this tax will not be an additional burden, or will it be the'"Slush'Fund" <br /> that was intimated by opponents and repeated in the Tribune; and because it ensures <br /> definite property tax reductions that will greatly benefit all of the people; and <br /> lastly because these safeguards are to be submitted to the people for referendum. I <br /> have no alternative but to urge favorable action not only on this ordinance but each <br /> and every one that bears on this specific topic and as they are to be considered here <br /> tonight. <br /> Louis Weiss, Councilman <br /> Councilman Herkner stated that he would be for the sales tax provided it was needed and provided the <br /> sales tax was adopted from Burlingame South. He spoke about the inevitability of the Council having to set <br /> the $1.00 tax limit. He soes not want to see San Mateo or any other northern city getting an advantage <br /> over Redwood City and therefore he feels that they should not introduce this ordinance but should introduce <br /> the ordinance covering the so-called County wide sales and use tax. Councilman Herkner amended the motion <br /> and introduced the so-called County ordinance and adopt ordinance #3 (County wide sales and use tax). The <br /> City Attorney stated that the Council could vote on whether or not they wanted to allow Councilman Herkner's <br /> r <br /> amendment. Councilman Herkner's motion lost for lack of a second. Councilman Spillers moved to'amend <br /> the motion and offered Mr. Lebsackla ordinance which was printed in the °Tribune. This motion lost for lack <br /> of a second. The original motion carried on roll call with Councilmen Herkner and Spillers voting NO. <br /> The Mayor called for a recess at 11:40 P.M. <br /> The meeting was called to order at 11:45 P.M. <br /> The City Attorney read the proposed ordiance imposing an excise tax on the storage, use or other consumption <br /> of tangible personal property. Councilman Weymouth offered introduction of the use tax on a local basis, <br /> seconded by Councilman Weiss. Councilman Spillers stated that since the Council has stated the things they <br /> were going to do that the City Manager is to make a list of priorities and proceed with the list. The <br /> motion carried-an roll call with Councilmen Herkner and Spillers voting NO. <br /> Councilman Granger offered RESOLUTION 2187 ADOPTING A "USE TAX" RULE and moved its adoption, seconded by <br /> Councilman Weymouth and carried on roll call with Councilman Spillers 'voting NO. <br /> The Mayor read the proposed ordinance imposing a uniform sales and use tax. Councilman Stout offered <br /> ,,. introduction of the ordinance, seconded by Councilman Weymouth and carried on roll call, Councilman Spillers <br /> voting NO. <br /> After the reading of the proposed ordinance, Councilman Stout offered introduction of the ordinance of <br /> the City providing for the allocation of certain revenues of the City; establishing a maximum tax rate <br /> poom <br /> for general municipal purposes: and, providing for submission of a measure of the next general election <br /> relative to said matters, seconded by Councilman Weiss and carried on roll call, Councilman Spillers voting <br /> NO. <br /> Councilman Weiss moved that the City Attorney draft and submit for information a resolution whereby the <br /> ordinances can be introduced by title provided that each councilman be given a copy of this ordinance one <br /> week before it is adopted by the council. The City Attorney stat-)d that there were times when the Council <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.