My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1957
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1957
>
CC MIN 1957
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
9/1/2016 5:29:47 PM
Creation date
7/25/2016 1:11:27 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/7/1957
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
262
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
4 9 7 <br /> Jain stated that the plans and specifications are in the process of being handed to the Council next week. <br /> Mr. Lebsack outlined the proceedings of Kentfield-Palm-Valota Road Improvements, the first resolution <br /> establishing public hearing to be introduced on March 25th. Councilman Weiss seconded the motion. The <br /> Mayor told the people in the audience that their help will probably be needed when the first public hearing <br /> is held on the above mentioned improvements because some of the people on Valota Road are opposed to the <br /> improvements. The motion carried. <br /> DEPARTMENT OF PUt?LIC WORKS REGARDING ESTIMATE OF FUTURE NEEDS CITY' AND COUNTY ROAD SYSTEMS. The Clerk stated <br /> that he had a very lengthy letter from the Department of Public Works and also a report. Mr. Jain stated <br /> that this was going to be a very comprehensive report and also expensive, however, the City was required <br /> to fill out the report. He stated that the City could use gas tax funds. <br /> (:: Councilman Herkner moved that this be referred to the City Manager and City Engineer for recommendation, <br /> seconded by Councilman Granger. Mr. Jain stated that they had to make the report and there wasn't any way <br /> out of it. This 'as followed by discussion. Councilman Weiss was of the opinion that this hould also be <br /> turned over to the Planning Commission. Councilman Herkner changed his motion to include any other <br /> person or commission neeced to make the report. The motion carried. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL OF AMENDMENTS AND ADDITIONS TO ZONING ORDINANCE 600. The Planning <br /> Commission recommended approval of the following amendments and additions to the zoning ordinance: <br /> 1. Amend Section 15.1 (c) entitled "YARDS" to provide for the establishment of detached garages on the <br /> front half of the lot under certain conditions. <br /> 2. Amend a portion of Section 28.1 by adding thereto a definition of a Professional Office. <br /> 3. Amend Section 2.2 by adding the words "Now or in the future". <br /> )1. Amend- Ordinance No. 600 by adding thereto a new section establishing a restricted Multiple Family <br /> Residential District. <br /> 5. Amend Ordinance No. 600 by adding thereto a section establishing a Neighborhood Commercial District. <br /> 6. Amend Ordinance No. 600 by adding a new section establishing regulations for planned industrial <br /> districts. <br /> 7. Amend Ordiance No. 600 by changing Section 20.1 which would change the findings required to b e <br /> made by the Planning Commission in order to grant a Variance. <br /> 8. Amend Ordinance No. 600 by changing Section 20.2 which changes the nature of the findings <br /> necessary to be made by the Planning Commission. <br /> 9. Amend Ordinance No. 600 by changing Section 20.3, regarding the method of giving notice for public <br /> hearings. <br /> 10. Amend Ordinance No. 600 by changing Section 20.1, regarding action by the Planning Commission. <br /> 11. Amend Ordinance No. 600 by changing Section 20.5 to provide for appeal from the decision of the <br /> Planning commission and providing therein a method of such appeal. <br /> 12. Amend Ordinance No. 600 by changing Section 20.6, which section would set up a 5 day waiting period <br /> before granting of any variance. <br /> The City Attorney recommended that this be set for public hearing. Councilman Spillers moved that this <br /> rbe set for public hearing, seconded by Councilman Weymouth, public hearing April 8th. The motion carried. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED APPROVAL SHELL OIL COMPANY REQUEST FOR ABANDONMENT ANCHOR EASE/ NT LOTS 1 & 2, <br /> BLOCK 9, REDWOOD TERRACE #4 (Roosevelt and Upton). The Planning Commission stated in their letter of <br /> recommendation that letters were read from the Pacific Gas & Electric Company and City Engineer Jain which <br /> indicated agreement with abandonment. The Clerk read the title of the resolution. Councilman Spillers <br /> offered RESOLUTION 2200 AUTHORIZING ABANDONMENT OF ANCHOR EASEMENT SITUATED ON LOTS 1 AND 2, BLOCK 9, <br /> REDWOOD TERRACE NO. <br /> 4 and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Granger and carried on roll call. <br /> PLANNING COMMISSION RECOMMENDED DENIAL J. B. FERRANDO APPLICATION TO REZONE LOTS 10 TO 13, BLOCK 6, W"ODACRE <br /> KNOLLS (2079 WOODSIDE ROAD) FROM R-3 TO C-1-H. The Clerk stated that he had a letter from Mr. Ferrando <br /> asking that this be set for public hearing for the second meeting in April. Councilman Spillers moved to <br /> set this for public hearing on April 8th, seconded by Councilman Stout and carried. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.