Laserfiche WebLink
270 <br /> ARB BLK LOT OWNER OLD NEW DIFF— REASON <br /> 530 3A Milland Development Company 1,129.85 1,120.94 — 8.91 Acquistion by <br /> State of California <br /> 533 7 California Pac. Title Ins. Co. 64.62 62.79 - 1.83 Acquistion by <br /> State of California <br /> 533 12 California Pac. Title Ins. Co. 76.83 74.27 — 2.56 Acquistion by <br /> State of California <br /> 534 1 California Pac. Title Ins. Co. , 19.30 12.70 - 6.60 _ Acquistion by <br /> State of California <br /> 503H 6A • W. F. & Elsie Disney 158.34 158.34 City acquired for <br /> Industrial JVay <br /> 339 1F Ralph Filice 984.06 374.60 -609.46 Transferred to <br /> Unsecured Roll <br /> 503H 3 William Aller 166.78 146.94 — 19.84 Acquired for Street <br /> purposes <br /> 113 31 Wilda Rhodes 1.73 82.58 80.85 Escaped assessment <br /> NET DECREASE $1,701.37 <br /> mmig <br /> The motion carried on roll call. <br /> CITY ENGINEER REPORT REGARDING BRIDGES, KENTFIELD—PLAM AND VALOTA IMPROVEMENTS. In his report the City <br /> Attorney stated that before proceeding with the preliminary spreads of a ssessments for this project, <br /> and commencement of assessment proceedings, it will be necessary to determine the amount and area over <br /> which the cost of the culvert structures are to be assessed and the amount of City contribution, if <br /> any, to the project. It is necessary that study and a decision by the Council be made at the earliest <br /> possible date so that assessment proceedings can be started immediately to allow for start of <br /> construction in the early Spring. This was followed by discussion in regrd to the situation and also <br /> the matter that money will have to be made available if the City goes along with this. The Mayor set <br /> a study meeting for January 16th. <br /> The Mayor announced the study meeting for January 9th would be held at 8:00 P.M. with the Veterans Memorial <br /> Building Commission. <br /> The City Attorney explained to the Council that it was necessary to adopt a resolution exchanging sewer <br /> easements between the City and Axel Backlund and Hans & Norma Nissen. An error had been made in the <br /> descriptions. Councilman Spillers offered RESOLUTION 2171 AUTHORIZING EXCHANGE OF CERTAIN DISCRIBED <br /> SANITARY SEWER EASEMENTS OF EQUAL VALUE BETWEEN CITY OF REDWOOD CITY AND AXEL C.BACKLUND AND HANS S. <br /> NISSEN AND NORMA L. NISSEN, HIS WIFE, and moved its adoption, seconded by Councilman Weiss and carried <br /> on roll call. <br /> The City Attorney stated that he had a Resolution proclaiming printing week. Councilman Spillers offered <br /> RESOLUTION 2172 PROCLAIMING JANUARY 13v19, a957, AS PRINTING WEEK and moved its adoption, seconded <br /> by Councilman Stout and carried on roll call. The City Attorney, when questioned, stated that he <br /> could n o t find any record where the Mayor can sitn a proclamation. He stated that he would draw <br /> up the necessary resolution giving the Mayor the authority to sign proclamations and bring same <br /> back to the Council for approval. <br /> Councilman Granger moved to have a resolution drawn up transferring the$13,000 from the Port to a special P"4 <br /> Yacht Harbor Improvement Fund. This was followed by discussion in regard to the fund which is already <br /> set up under the name of Aquatic Park Fund. Councilman Herkner seconded the motion. Councilman <br /> Weiss read the following prepared statement: <br /> So as to place this matter in its true perspective, I believe it no more than <br /> appropriate that we have a complete understanding of the background leading to this ,,,,,.o <br /> dividend of gp13,000 from the Port to the General funds of the city, and its relative <br /> impact on the general financial program of the city, especially as affecting its ultimate <br /> IMO <br /> disposition and use. This is especially important when we realize that the Port has <br /> several different proglems of considerable import under consideration and which can <br /> involve considerable funds; namely the possibility of expenditure of some $15,000 more <br /> or less for a survey of port facilities, its potentialities for-the future, its needs <br /> for development and general finances; as well as the advisability of submitting to the <br /> people a proposal for a bond ^issue of considerable magnitude. <br /> For that reason I would like to read certain excerpts from the Port Commissions <br /> minutes of November 13th as it affects this so called dividend of $13,000, and I quote <br /> "Representatives o1 the :Cityfs Yacht Harbor Committee (Councilman Carl,Britschgi, Uhirman <br />