My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
AgdaPkt 2004-08-09
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Agenda Packets
>
2000-2009 partial
>
2004
>
AgdaPkt 2004-08-09
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/16/2012 4:10:55 PM
Creation date
8/5/2004 1:34:45 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Agenda Packet
Date
8/9/2004
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
196
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
�8 <br /> and than will become a busy street. It is a nightmare that residents will be forced to live on a daily <br /> basis.Do you have any answers for this concem? Again, the proposal is very conceptual and the <br /> actual location has not been determined. 'That will be refined and determined upon preparation of <br /> the planning documents. <br /> Are sidewalks required for all housing within Redwood City? Sidewalks are usually required on <br /> Standard City Streets, but may not be required on private streets or sub-standard streets. The <br /> actual street design w�ill be deteimined during project review and approvals. <br /> The report mentions selling the property to some entity willing to purchase and own and create <br /> open space. Were any groups approached and made aware of this property? Do you have a listing <br /> of such groups that county residents would be able to approach? This was only mentioned as an <br /> option. The City Council, if it so desires, can direct staff to pursue this option (although it is not <br /> recorrunended). <br /> Although this land does not fit the direction of the Pazk Dept's sporting fields, are there other <br /> types of parks that might be considered? Accessibility to Redwood City is mentioned in the report <br /> as a limiting factor for this land's usage. Brewster Avenue is a very direct route to the area and <br /> wondered if that route might be considered into the development or why it isn't being considered <br /> as an entry way. Again, this was based on a discussion with our Parks Department. The planning <br /> documents (Precise Plan and accompanying traffic studies) �vill examine that issue. <br /> The size of the homes that will be built is a very large concern of surrounding neighbors. We are <br /> seeing 2 and 3 story homes being built and are afraid the development will follow suit. Homes of <br /> that size will destroy our privacy and would like to see that avoided for this neighborhood by <br /> having county residents involved in the planning stage rather than after this land is in the hands of <br /> a developer. Are there any plans to involve the county residents in the planning stage? Staff is <br /> also concerncd about the scale and size of the buildings. For this reason we are proposing a <br /> Precise Plan to berier regulate the size and mass. Again, the Precise Plan w�ll be subject to public <br /> hearings and the county residents can participate in that review and discussion. <br /> I hope you might be able to answer some of the questions and concerns I've mentioned. <br /> Thank you, <br /> Virginia Bobadilla <br /> A Hillcrest Drive Resident <br /> County Neighbor <br /> wil <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.