Laserfiche WebLink
� 60 <br /> ► <br /> � Route 280 to Woodside Road, east on Woodside Road to <br /> � Bayshore Freeway, to the project site, and would result <br /> } in an increase to the contract price of $6,E00. <br /> � <br /> � <br /> � <br /> ; In discussion which followed, it was determined that the <br /> � number of days involved would be the same in either case, ,,,,,�, <br /> � and concern was expressed as to whether the addition of <br /> � approximately 11� to the contract cost was �ustified. � <br /> � It was also indicated that the extra cost would come <br /> ; out of Capital Improvement funds, and not District funds. <br /> ' MOTION: Councilman Norris moved, seconded by Councilman <br /> Barrett, that the Council authorize issuance of a Change <br /> , Order to the Redwood Shores Levee Maintenance Pro�ect <br /> � contract for the additional expenditure of $E,600 to � <br /> cover the alternate haul route. <br /> ' The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> ' (MINUTE ORDER N0. 74�-190) <br /> i <br /> � Dumbarton Bridge Access Road Extension <br /> � <br /> ; <br /> ; City Manager Fales referred to his report of October 3, <br /> ' 1974, to which was attached detailed reports by the <br /> r Director of Public Works and the Tra.ffic Engineer. <br /> � Based on these technical reports as well as a series <br /> j of staff discussion, the Citv Manager made the follow- <br /> k ing recommendations : <br /> � <br /> � l. The City of Redwood City should initiate con- "�"� <br /> sideration of possible extension of the new <br /> � Dumbarton Bridge Access Road to the area of <br /> w :.,� <br /> the Harbor Boulevard-Woodside Road freeway <br /> interchange. Such consideration should be <br /> � conditioned as recommended by the Director <br /> r of Public Works as follows : <br /> f <br /> : <br /> � a, that the final alignment of this arterial <br /> : would have to be approved by Redwood City; <br /> i <br /> G b. that a policy be approved by the State re- <br /> s �arding future connections to the arterial <br /> � by ad�acent property owners and/or other <br /> ; City streets; <br /> r <br /> i <br /> j c. tha,t the realignment and reconstruction of <br /> ' the existing streets be the responsibility <br /> + of the State <br /> E 2. The City of Redwood City should clearly indi- <br /> f cate to the Town of Atherton and the State of <br /> i California that, based upon its analysis, <br /> � Redwood City's consideration of such an access <br /> � <br /> � road extension will only be in the context of � <br /> � an addition to the Marsh Road access point and <br /> not as a substitute for the Marsh Road connec- ,��, <br /> �, tion; and <br /> � 3. The matter of further extension of the new <br /> � Dumbarton Bridge Access Road to the vicinity <br /> E . <br /> -8- <br /> Reg.Mtg. <br /> r 10/7/74 <br /> C <br /> � <br /> 1- _ �......�. _ <br /> '---t,�,�'�'�'w�,�,.,,' _ �,. .- .......,, .-... , .>�-° �o--_�� ,,.w,.....;:�+. _ <br />