Laserfiche WebLink
262 <br /> � <br /> � Mr. Fales referred to his report of October 3, 1974 to <br /> which were attached an analysis by the City Attorney, <br /> ! and reports from the Chief Building Official and <br /> � Director of Public Works, and copy of a letter from HUD <br /> ; and flood hazard map. The report was intended for in- <br /> 4 formation only, and no specific action recommended at � <br /> ' this time. <br /> � <br /> � <br /> '� In the ensuing discussion it was pointed out that the <br /> criteria and data used in preparation of the flood maps <br /> , by consultants in Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, were un- <br /> known, since they were received without covering the <br /> , information. Some of the concerns expressed related <br /> I to the costs for a study to determine the validity of <br /> ! the maps and the elevations of the flood hazards, <br /> ! whether this study is necessary and if so, whether it <br /> � coul d be Federally funded earlier than the anticipated <br /> four- to six-year wait for a Corps of Engineers study. <br /> Council also felt it would be remiss not to convey to <br /> our legislative representatives concern with respect <br /> � to imposition of this legislation on cities without <br /> having the opportunity to influence it. City Manager <br /> '� Fales concurred, and in this regard, Mr. Pardee indi- <br /> cated that as far as was known, no one had received the <br /> � data base for the so-called tentative findings. Mr. <br /> Pardee also reported that he had mixed reactions from <br /> citizens in Humboldt County this s�ring regarding the <br /> Act, some feeling that it was a good program, and others <br /> � emphatic in not wanting any kind of Federal control. He <br /> � noted that where the program is volun,tary, there is very <br /> i little interest in buying the insurance. � <br /> € <br /> � City Mana-ger Fales advised that it was intended to con- � � <br /> � tinue discussions with HUD (Department of Housing and <br /> � Urban Development) , and to send copies of this material <br /> p to the Congressional representatives, as well as to <br /> � meet with them. <br /> � <br /> ! MOTION: Councilman Williams moved, seconded by Council- <br /> man Rhodes; concurrence in the City Manager' s recommen- <br /> h dations relating to Federal Flood Disaster Protection <br /> ; Act oF 1973. <br /> � <br /> � The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. <br /> � (MINUTE ORDER N0. 7�-192) <br /> t <br /> 4 <br /> � Re uest of Councilman Norris re <br /> t <br /> es a s en o po icy �e�ar ng smoking <br /> P Councilman Norris spoke in support of his request, <br /> � stating that many public and private entities have <br /> � recognized smoking to be offensive to many people, but <br /> � are reluctant to impose outright prohibition. He pro- <br /> posed that Council consider adopting a resolution re- �* <br /> garding City Council meetings whereby a section for <br /> smokers and another for non-smokers be set aside, and ���, <br /> so posted. <br /> Mayor Weymouth responded that the meeting place is con- <br /> I trollea by the County and felt there would be some <br /> I <br /> f -10- <br /> R��7�7�. <br /> � _ �� .��. � ., �.,, .. ,..-�.� -�-�-.-�-�,.a, <br /> �___...� ..._.._�,} <br /> �.. . <br />