CC MIN 1974 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

. 3 � �� obtain Tentative and Final Subdivision Maps in order to sell the units as planned and offered to make filing and recordation of such maps a condition of approval of the subject application. Mr. Gardella advised that ,,..,� such maps are expensive, and the developer wished to obtain the Planned Development Permit before procee ng further. Mr. Gardella replied to questions from Council �'� y regarding the proposed development. Chuck Riffle, Currie, Lebsack & Hannig, attorney for the neig or oo group in opposition to granting of the sub- ject permit, showed slides depicting statements of the group with regard to their belief the development is not in harmony with the present neighborhood; a quote from Section �46.7 of the Code; a statement as to why the neighbors believe the development is not in harmony with the neighborhood; photos of the neighborhood; sketch of the proposed modern units; the proposed development; and Section 34•51 of the Subdivision Code regarding cul de sacs. Mr. Riffle suggested that if the permit is granted, the Council will have indicated general approval of the subdivision maps before they are presented. Mr. Riffle stated that essentially the people of the neighborhood do not believe the proposed lot-line units fit the present neighborhood and that permit should not be granted until more is known about the final development. Lengthy discussion followed and City Attorney Schricker replied to questions concerning the relationship of the ^^ Tentative a.nd Final Subdivision Map requirements to the Planned Development Permit. __ `� Mrs. Ral h Arellano, 1808 Valota Road, indicated her res ence on e s ide of the subject neighborhood and urged the subject permit be granted in order that the neighborhood might have a uniform development of the entire property. Mrs. Arellano commented on the fire safety of the proposed units; on the right of property owners to rent their property; and on the existing duplex development across the road on Kansas Street. MOTION: Councilman Leipzig moved, seconded by Council- man Rhodes, to close the public hearing. The motion carried unanimously by voice vote. The public hearing was closed at 8 :55 p.m. MOTION: Title having been read, Councilman Barrett in- troduced the following resolution and moved its adoption with an added condition (e ) that the Subdivision Map be filed and recorded and that the determination be made that the proposed development meets the require- ments of the Subdivision Code section with regard to !�""' harmony with the existing neighborhood : �rrw RESOLUTION CONDITIONALLY APPROVING r�PPLICATION FOR PLANNID DEVELOPMENT PERMIT, RELATING TO REAL PROPERTY IN THE VICINITY OF VALOTA ROAD AND ANAMOR STREET The Motion failed for lack of a second. _3_ Reg.Mtg. 11/11/7�