Laserfiche WebLink
237 <br /> In additional discussion, Councilman Rhodes asked whether Council <br /> could take action to approve or disapprove the project at this meeting . <br /> City Attorney advised that before action could be taken the public <br /> hearing must be closed , and that Council did have some options with <br /> respect to proceedings . However , Federal regulations required that <br /> the record to open for ten days , although this would not preclude <br /> taking on option , He then listed the alternatives . <br /> Councilman Rhodes moved to close the public hearing, seconded by Council - <br /> man Weymouth and carried , <br /> Councilman Rhodes moved to terminate the proposed project , seconded by <br /> Councilman Weymouth , who expressed concern for the businessmen who <br /> objected to elimination of parking , and felt that perhaps some of the <br /> other suggestions proposed could be done , instead . Councilman Henderson <br /> spoke in opposition to the motion , indicating that terminating pro- <br /> ceedings would have an adverse effect on Redwood City and would be <br /> counter to the philosophy in the 5-year Capital Improvement Program . <br /> Councilman Williams felt that improvements were necessary to El Camino <br /> Real , and was not totally against the project , but suggested that the <br /> City should go back and look at other options . Councilman Leipzig <br /> agreed that the project should not be " skuttled " completely . Councilman <br /> Rhodes stated that his intent in the motion to terminate related to the <br /> project that would eliminate parking , and intended nothing that would <br /> prevent staff from coming back with another plan . At recommendation of <br /> the City Attorney , Councilman Rhodes further clarified his motion to <br /> specify Alternate Plan 1 ( Exhibit "A " ) , which leaves El Camino Real as <br /> it is now , but with Staff to come back at any time with alternate plans <br /> for improvement . Mayor Keckley felt that the motion was a step backward , <br /> and that improvements were needed for safety reasons . He added that Council <br /> would need to make a decision by December 18th , or the decision would be <br /> made for them . Following additional discussion , motion FAILED on a tie <br /> vote , Councilmen Henderson , Leipzig and Mayor Keckley voting no ; Council- <br /> men Rhodes , Weymouth and Williams voting yes , and Councilman Norris being <br /> noted absent . <br /> Councilman Henderson moved that Council have on its agenda of December 18 , <br /> 1972 , as a regular item of business (not a public hearing) , consideration <br /> of Alternate Plan 3 ( of Exhibit "A " ) , seconded by Councilman Williams . <br /> Councilman Weymouth asked whether the absent Councilman ( Councilman Norris ) <br /> would have the privilege of voting at that time , having not participated in <br /> the public hearing . City Attorney advised that Councilman Norris could <br /> 12/6/72 <br /> Adj . Reg . Mtg . <br />