CC MIN 1972 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

403 the widening until Alameda could be reviewed by Council in the context of all recommendations that would be made in the five -year program . Councilman Henderson expressed concern with respect to the fact that the Alameda had been before Council for many years and that the people Two would be affected needed reassurance for a specified period . She felt that there should be substantial statistical evidence when the time came that the widening was necessary . City Manager advised that in the suggested priority order of projects many factors would be considered in the recommendations , including expenditures , benefit to the community as a: whole , aesthetic values and others . Relative to inquiry concerning CP. T\r , he indicated Council would have an opportunity in the near future to view this , that staff was now in initial stages of gathering information and meeting with operators of the system . He suggested that questions or areas of concern the Council might have be transmitted to his office , since he had found it beneficial when a franchisee wants to request rate increases to have these kinds of. discussions . Mayor Bury presented to Councilman Rhodes , Chairman of the Council Tra.nsporta. tion Committee , framed Certificate of Commendation presented to Redwood City in recognition of the Mini Bus System . PUBLIC HEARING , Resolution of Intention of the Planning Commission to amend the Zoning Ordinance , Ordinance Ho . 1130 , relating to fee structure for Zoning Ordinance applications . Planning Commission had recommended , following a public hearing on December i4 , 1971 , that the proposed amendment would be in the best interest of the City as a whole , since cost of processing various zoning applications far exceeded fees for such processing . Report was submitted to Council . City Manager reported that due to the very technical language in the proposed Ordinance , staff was not entirely sure that what was being recnmended as legislation had accurately translated what was intended by the Planning Commission , and that therefore it was suggested and recommended to Council that the ma. tter be referred back to the Planning Commission for clarification . City Attorney suggested it might be preferable to continue the hearing to a date certain , to obviate the need to set another hearing . Councilman Weymouth moved to continue the public hearing to March 6 , 1972 , and refer the matter back to the Planning Commission for their clarification , 2 _7 - 7