Laserfiche WebLink
281 <br />Minutes of Adjourned Regular Meeting <br />Redwood City Council <br />June 4, 1970 7:00 P.M. <br />Community Activities Building <br />Mayor Bury called the meeting to order at 7:00 P.M. <br />ON ROLL CALL the following were noted present: Councilman Dixon Arnett, <br />Mary W. Henderson, Paul C. Keckley, Herbert G. Petersen, William C. <br />Rhodes, Ray A. Weymouth, Mayor Robert H. Bury, and City Clerk Marian <br />McCrindle. Also noted present were City Manager Howard C. Ullrich, <br />Assistant City Manager Henry V. Burget, Auditor -Accountant Jack <br />Ference and Personnel Director Alfred Wiers, <br />Mayor Bury reported on his attendance at the June 4 meeting of Veterans <br />Memorial Commission, and his having indicated to them Council concern <br />in not having received the anticipated report from that Commission. <br />He had also suggested to them more meaningful uses for the building <br />could be made, and that possibility of reducing the Commission to <br />three members might be considered. Mr. Granger indicated to him <br />he no longer wished to serve and submitted verbal resignation. <br />Copies of their minutes will be provided. He reported also that <br />the Manager had advised him the Tannery property had been posted <br />for abatement, and that the Peterson Hotel demolition was nearly <br />completed. <br />It had been recommended by City Attorney to Mayor Bury that any personnel <br />matters to be considered would be subject to Executive Session, and <br />on motion of Councilman Arnett, seconded by Councilman Rhodes and <br />carried, meeting adjourned to Executive Session for discussion of <br />personnel matters at 7:15 P.M. <br />Adjourned Regular Meeting reconvened at 8:50 P.M. Auditor -Accountant <br />reported on his contacts with the telephone company relative to the <br />proposed utility user tax, and as a practical matter they feel there <br />should be no maximum or minimum provision, because of added costs <br />in the computer programming. In response to question as to time <br />schedule, if decision is made to approve the tax, Auditor -Accountant <br />stated the telephone company required time to go through accounts, <br />and there would be necessity to determine which accounts are within <br />the City limits, and have indicated it would require three months <br />from the time tax is approved. <br />