CC MIN 1970 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

126 functioning in 1975. It is planned to present the proposal at service clubs, because of the importance to make the general public aware of the magnitude of the project, particularly as to problems of timing and staging. He indicated less than complete success in interesting the public in what is hoped to be done, and the purpose of the open house is to provide everyone the opportunity to see the proposal. In discussion which followed, the matter of an interim program was questioned, since the ultimate plan is of such great magnitude with an important effect on the downtown community. City Manager advised of the meetings held with the Downtown Merchants, with discussions concerning renovation, such as resurfacing of facades of the structures, and that all were enthusiastic until the subject of costs came up. Responding to question, he elaborated by stating that, while the merchants were not unresponsive, the reaction was natural and that in some cases the costs were relatively small, but in others, the costs ranged to $35,000 or more. He stated there is a continuing method by which it is possible to finance joint public and private type development under Redevelopment Act, and believed this could be accomplished if enough "seed money" can be generated. He noted several of the downtown stores which have done an outstanding job in improving the appearance of their buildings, and there have been preliminary talks with some of the merchants as to what can be done in public right-of-way, without use of a great amount of public funds. It was also felt that if property owners and merchants are willing to improve exterior appearance of the buildings, • the community might then be willing to join in and improve the areas adjacent to these blocks. Council indicated recognition of concern by the merchants on the perimeter of the proposed Complex in terms of timing, and the effect on their businesses. It was generally agreed, also, that involvement of the public with the proposal was important. Request of Albert W. Straub, 1306 Edgewood Road, for outside City Limits sewer connec- tion. Staff report stated the request was made because the owner proposes to enlarge his residence but was advised by the County Health Department that his present septic _ tank was not adequate. The Department of Public Works reported that the City's 12" VCP sewer main is adjacent to the property and has the capacity to serve the property, but is approximately 21 feet deep at this location. The property is not contiguous to the City limits, and no evidence of hardship has been presented. Staff therefore recommended denial of the request. City Manager offered addi- tional comments, noting the Ordinance provides that some hardship must be demonstrated, but acknowledged the desire of the applicant to improve living conditions in his home. He pointed out to Council, however, the action in which the City is presently concerned, relative to a "cease and desist" order against