Laserfiche WebLink
129 <br />representing full time peace officers and fire fighters, and <br />provide for formation of a 3 -member arbitration board. Com- <br />mittee recommends opposition, since the effect would be to <br />restrict freedom ofnegotia ion between the subject parties <br />and further deprive local agencies of jurisdiction over local <br />matters. <br />4. Property Taxation (ACA 21, SCA 2). Both proposed Consti- <br />tutional amendments would change the method of property taxa- <br />tion so that local governments would be either restricted or <br />prohibited from imposing property taxes, and would transfer <br />administration of taxation to the State Legislature, with <br />provisions for subventions to local governments to replace <br />revenue sources eliminated by the amendments. Loss of ability <br />to tax locally would have such an adverse effect on local <br />financing that severe and disruptive financial problems would <br />be encountered by municipalities. Committee recommends oppo- <br />sition to ACA 21 and SCA 2. <br />5. Disclosure of Assets (SB 274, AB 430). These pending bills <br />relate to disclosure of assets of certain designated local <br />officials, requiring that they file as a public record a state- <br />ment listing name, instrument of ownership and any position of <br />management held in any business entity in which their financial <br />interest exceeds $1,000, and if so, it must be stated whether <br />such interest is more or less than $5,000 in value. Other <br />certain officials would so list such investments only when the <br />business entity is one which is regulated by the agency, depart- <br />ment, board, committee or commission of which such officials <br />are members. Committee recommends support of SB 274 and AB 430, <br />since some of the provisions would be eliminated from the present <br />act which tend to discourage responsible citizens from seeking <br />public office. <br />6. Redwood City State Colle e Site. Committee has learned that <br />the State College Board o Trustees has requested permission of <br />the Coordinating Council for Higher Education to proceed with <br />construction of the San Mateo State College in Redwood City. <br />Since construction will presumably require legislative appropri- <br />ations, and since in the opinion of the Committee it is in the <br />best interest of the City to urge early construction of the <br />college, it is recommended that the Council advise the State <br />C2111 Board o Trustees, he Coordinating Cos or Higher <br />Education and the Ci y s legislative representatives, of the <br />City's desire or early construction, Committee has accordingly <br />prepared a resolution for considera ion by Council, and recom- <br />mends adoption. In addition, it is recommended that Staff be <br />requested to report to Council within 60 days as to recommenda- <br />tions with regard to adequate traffic facilities necessary to <br />accommodate use of the college site. <br />Councilman Rosselli indicated acceptance of the Legislative Report, with exception <br />of Item 5, <br />pertaining <br />to <br />disclosure <br />of assets. <br />He <br />felt it placed a <br />handicap on non- <br />political <br />positions, <br />and <br />that it was <br />an invasion <br />of <br />privacy. Mayor <br />Bury concurred, <br />in that the matter of these disclosure bills is being given emphasis, but seem <br />more difficult to comply with. Councilman Weymouth also indicated opposition. <br />Councilman Arnett moved to accept the report and implement recommendations, seconded <br />by Councilman Keckley. Motion carried, Councilman Rosselli voting no. (MINUTE <br />ORDER # 70-46) <br />Councilman Arnett moved to adopt resolution urging early construction of State <br />College in Redwood City, seconded by Councilman Henderson. Mayor Bury requested <br />whether it would be possible to obtain a copy of the resolution for review of the <br />text, and that action be deferred until the next meeting. He expressed concern <br />about the desirability of urging construction. He felt that consideration of <br />the problems of logistics involved with the obvious added traffic problems should <br />be considered, and noted that having observed traffic generated since the opening <br />of the Junior College, it may be that another college may not be wanted. Council- <br />man Arnett stated that it was not a question of whether or not to have the college, <br />