My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Browse
Search
CC MIN 1969
RedwoodCity
>
City Clerk
>
Minutes
>
1969
>
CC MIN 1969
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/2/2016 5:20:25 PM
Creation date
8/2/2016 3:50:09 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
CC Index
CC Index - Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Regular
Agency Type
City Council
Date
1/6/1969
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
344
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
3 3 2 <br /> to review by the Urban Design Committee , all easements and sites for public utilities <br /> and services to be satisfactory to City Engineer , water mains layout be modified to <br /> the satisfaction of Public Works Director , lot radii of 10 feet be indicated for Lots <br /> 1 and 26 , Block D , and Lots 1 and 30 , Block C , and approval of the Tentative Map be - <br /> come effective not before final approval of the Planned Development Permit . Council --- <br /> questioned dedication of the two publicparking areas as to responsibility for main- <br /> tenance and establishment of parking regulations . <br /> City Manager advised this parking concept designed basically in response to concerns <br /> expressed for more parking spaces in other townhouse projects and if dedicated to <br /> theCity and maintained by the City would give more control through police authority <br /> which would not be possible otherwise , and also give access for emergency vehicles . <br /> Mr . Brian explained from subdivision map the reduction of <br /> two of lots at end of cul -de - sacs from a 15 ' frontage to <br /> 12 ' frontage for reason that subdivider desired to widen <br /> out area between buildings . <br /> Council questioned effect of this change since hearing by the Planning Commission <br /> and was advised by the City Attorney this would be noted before the Planning Commis- <br /> sion when Final Map being considered and would have recommendation thereon by the <br /> Staff , but in any event not considered a substantive change and that the resolution <br /> prepared provides for exceptions without specifying details . <br /> Councilman Henderson expressed her disapproval of these townhouse development plans <br /> as seemed to be condensing to less and less area , and also expressed concern for de - <br /> signs for panhandle type lots being proposed . Motion carried on roll call vote , <br /> Councilman Henderson voting no , Councilmen Petersen and Rosselli being noted absent . <br /> REPORT OF BID OPENING , Middlefield Road Widening , Chestnut to Maple Street . The fol - <br /> lowing bids were received : <br /> Fisk , Firenze & McLean $ 106 , 875 . 80 <br /> Piombo Corp , 108 , 915 . 00 <br /> L . C . Smith 119 , 623 . 00 <br /> Freeman Sondgroth 128 , 106 , 74 <br /> Engineer ' s Estimate $ 100 , 667 , 50 <br /> Staff recommended award of bid to Fisk , Firenze and McLean , the low bidder . <br /> Councilman Keckley moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO , 6002 AWARDING CONTRACT FOR CONSTRUCTION <br /> OF MIDDT1EFTELD ROAD WIDENING - CHESTNUT STREET TO MAPLE STREET - IN THE CITY OF RED- <br /> WOOD CITY; REJECTING ALL OTHER BIDS RECEIVED ; AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF CONTRACT FOR <br /> SAID WORK ; AND DIRECTING RETURN OF SECURITY DEPOSIT , seconded by Councilman Henderson <br /> and carried on roll call vote , Councilmen Petersen and Rosselli being noted absent . <br /> REPORT OF BID OPENING , Parkway Fencing ( Peninsula Parkway, Section 1 , Bridge Parkway , <br /> Section 1 , GID 1 -64 ) . The following bids were received : <br /> Lin . Ft . Total <br /> Bleilly & Collishaw , Inc , 513 . 13 533 , 443 . 00 <br /> Cagwin & Dorward 14 . 19 36 , 090 . 00 <br /> Consultant ' s estimate 8 , 40 21 , 361 . 20 <br /> City Manager ' s report to Council recommended bids be rejected and advised Staff , <br /> working with consultants Ribera & Sue , will reexamine the wood fence design and de - <br /> termine the feasibility of going out to bid on the concrete fence design as previously <br /> proposed , <br /> 09 .69 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.