CC MIN 1969 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

380 permit , and similar to that also reviwed by some members of the Council in the Westlake townhouse complex in Westlake last year . He noted the main concerns for this type of planned development had been expressed by critical comments in the first two concepts as to parking , or lack thereof , and it was believed theplan as now propaed for off -street parking in center of cul -de - sac area would remove this concern and if dedicated to City so both police and fire have adequate at ntrol , Staff had agreed this concept for parking far superior to those previously approved . He advised the specific conditions attached to recommendation for approval by the Planning Commission were basically the same as those set for the first two planned development permits . In reply to question concerning foundation construction in dwellings in Redwood Shores and whether recommendations specifically stated relating to seismic action had been includedin this construction , Chief Building Official advised this subject had been studied extensively because of the recommendations and foundation construction especially designed by Leslie Properties and being constructed in strict conformity to those recommended conditions for seismic control , and as approved by the City . In reply to question as to reduction of frontage on two lots from 15 ' to 12 ' , Planning Director advised this change had not as yet been considered by the Planning Commission since approval of the Subdivision exceptions by the Council , but since not a substantive change , merely a widening out of space between panhandle lots at the end of the cul -de - sac for more open space , he felt convinced of approval when Final Map being considered , since Staff felt this to be an improvement in the plan . Lawrence Brian , consulting engineer for Swartz Co . , stated when exceptions had been approved by Council previously it had been pointed out the advantage of reducing frontage for these lots in order to allow more open space , which the Staff had approved and which the Planning Commi. ssbn would have ample opportunity to consider when reviewing the Final Map . ° Further discussion and questioning as to procedure , and whether it would not have been proper for a report to have been submitted to this effect before Council taking further action . City Manager agreed a Staff report should have been made to include as part of Council record of action on this matter . Councilman Weymouth moved to close the public hearing , seconded by Councilman Rosselli and carried . Councilman Arnett moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO , 6022 APPROVING APPLICATION FOR PLANNED DEVELOPMENT PERMIT RELATING TO MARLIN SUBDIVISION NO . 3 WITHIN GENERAL IMPROVEMENT DISTRICT 1 -64, REDWOOD CITY, CALIFORNIA, SUBJECT TO CERTAIN CONDITIONS , seconded by Councilman Weymouth and carried on roll call vote , Councilman Henderson voting no , Councilman Keckley and Mayor Bury being noted absent . GID 1-64 , Series " D'? Bonds . Vice Mayor Petersen advised of the thorough briefing which had been held with all pro - fessional consultants this date concerning this subject , in order that all questions and concerns might be discussed so questions need not be duplicated at this meeting . He stated it was not intended to give appearance that this subject matter is being taken lightly by the Council . City Manager introduced the representatives of all fields of City ' s Consultant Staff who had participated in the preparation of the bond brochure and Official Statement , who were present at this meeting to clarify any points and advise ofthe final actions and modifications made to the draft as a result of the meeting held today . Mr . Herman B . Zelles , of Stone & Youngberg , City ' s financial consultants , presented copies of the final draft of the Official t93 23'6