CC MIN 1969 - Laserfiche WebLink

Browse Search

3 ,79 Urban Design Committee , and that amendment to agreement requested because there is additional urban design work to be done , as well as other minor consulting services . City Manager also advised amendment proposed would provide for a maximum expelditure of $4000 . Motion carried on roll call vote , Councilmen Arnett and Keckley , and Mayor Bury being noted absent . Councilman Henderson moved to adopt RESOLUTION NO . 6021 AUTHORIZING AND APPROVING AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT FOR CONTINUED CONSULTING SERVICES ( URBAN DESIGN ) seconded by Councilman Rosselli and carried on roll call vote , Councilmen Arnett and Keckley , and Mayor Bury being noted absent . Renewal of agreement with the Downtown Merchants Association as requested by the President of the Association for the fiscal year July 1 , 1969 -June 30 , 1970, continued for two weeks ( July 7th ) as suggested , on motion of Councilman Henderson , seconded by Councilman Weymouth . Vice Mayor Petersen had reported that Mayor Bury suggested this item be con - tinued because of certain concerns which had been expressed in one from or another in this District , and since no one present from this business group , would recommend Council take action to continue this item . Councilman Rosselli inducated he had no objection to acknowledging Mayor Bury ' s request by continuing this matter , but felt more explicit reasons should have been submitted , and also that a definite policy should be established on all continuance requests , and - all such requests treated equally . Councilman Arnett entered the meeting at 7 : 50 P . M . Vice Mayor Petersen concurred if this item continued , a full report should be made to Council as some questions should be answered as to what benefits had been derived from this improvement Area , how businessmen in the area felt about its continuance , etc . In reply to question whether continuance of this item and lapse of agreement would result in any adverse reactions , City Attorney advised ordinance regarding collection of funds still in effect and would continue , and a lapse of several weeks in this funding agree - ment shouldn ' t hamper administration of the District as he was not aware of any impending programs during this time . City Clerk in reply to questioning also advised business license renewals , including the Improvement Tax in the Downtown Area , had been mailed , so would continue to collect such funds and hold in trust . Motion to continue this item to July 7th carried , Councilman Arnett abstaining because he was not present for full discussion ( MINUTE ORDER #69 - 127 ) PUBLIC HEARING , Application of STANLEY C . SWARTZ CO . for approval of a Planned Development Permit vo ntaining 84 single family attached dwellings , property located in Redwood Penin- sula , Marlin Subdivision No . 3 , being a resubdivision of Lots 25 , 27 , 63 and 64 , Block B Marlin Subdivision No . 1 , in an "R -2 -P " ( Residential -Duplex -Planned Development Combining ) District , declared open and affidavits of publication and mailing ordered filed . Planning Commission report previously submitted to Council advised Commission had voted unanimously to recommend to Council that they approve the application for this Planned Development Permit as requested , subject to certain specified conditions . City Manager reviewed how this request was for 84 single -family attached dwellings having the same basic floor plan arrangement as that of prior approved Permits in the Redwood Shores area . He also advised since approval of previous similar concepts and because of the concerns which had been evidenced , key City Officials had flown to Southern California to review almost identical construction by the Swartz Company as that proposed under this immlo