Laserfiche WebLink
lr <br /> City Manager also noted that DMJM and Ribera and Sue had been advised retention of <br /> full staff during period of cutback could not be justified , as the duration is <br /> uncertain . If the length of time could be known , it would be feasible to retain <br /> an effective work force , and wait it out . <br /> Mr . Reiter responded to question as to effect of the <br /> recent Santa Rosa area earthquake on the Redwood Shores <br /> seismic instruments , advising there had been a preliminary <br /> report by the Coast and Geodetic Survey based on use of <br /> smoked glass seismic scopes , which does not provide enough <br /> data to reach definite conclusions ; however , information <br /> is expected about mid -December from an analysis of <br /> readings on more sensitive instruments . <br /> City Manager stated Staff has one copy of report referred to , which does not <br /> contain a great deal of information , but copy will be provided in next Council <br /> mailing . ( Memo 11/4/69 ) <br /> Mr . Reiter further advised that a draft has been drawn up <br /> of an Agenda for meeting of the Seismic Advisory Board , <br /> noting that the 1965 report recommended that the Board re - <br /> convene in five years , and a recommendation will be made to <br /> Council on reactivation . <br /> Mn Kubelbeck , consultant to DMJM , noted that after his <br /> reading all past reports he had found that what he was being <br /> asked to comment on covers the same items ; that Feasibility <br /> Report of 1965 did anticipate economic problems , " tight <br /> money" , recession in building industry , but did not specifically <br /> anticipate the government would create what he termed an <br /> " instant depression " . However , felt District should be <br /> able to weather this type of problem as well , and that he <br /> was preparing a recommendation to submit to Council after <br /> a review of the situation . <br /> In answer to question whether report will cover effects of <br /> increased tax , and what figure or precentages would be , <br /> Mr . Kubelbeck advised they are working on this , assuring that <br /> taxes will not become confiscatory . He felt if a 25% <br /> increase in taxes was due to moratorium, this would not be <br /> confiscatory , and added that the present situation in Redwood <br /> Shores represents the worst possible conditions anticipated <br /> in the Feasibility Report , and believes current circumstances <br /> indicate guidelines in the Report can work under the most <br /> adverse conditions . <br /> Mr . Coleman Johnson , President of Leslie Properties , re - <br /> porting briefly, stated one builder is continuing to complete <br /> Unit I ; other builder had acquired lots in Dolphin Subdivision <br /> and pre - sold forty houses prior to the moratorium, however , <br /> there have been some cancellations . He advised also that <br /> publicity having an effect on timing of Shoretown and the <br /> shopping center . <br /> Councilman Keckley addressed Staff with respect to the great amount of discussion <br /> relating to " partnership " between City and Leslie properties , and requested an <br /> official statement of denial from both City Manager and Leslie Properties . <br /> Mr , Johnson replied that his misuse of the term <br /> " partnership" was regretted , and not intended to be taken <br /> in the literal legal sense , and pointed out that enabling <br /> Ordinance No , 1128 establishing the District clearly <br /> spells out the legal relationship of the City and Leslie <br /> Properties . As the representative of the leading landowner , <br /> he advised he had always been aware of the fact there is no <br /> legal partnership . <br /> 'et; <br />